Comments Thread For: Hearn: Khan is Petrified, Kell Brook Would End His Career!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 48371
    • 4,778
    • 266
    • 104,043

    #41
    Originally posted by Lou Cipher
    can anyone imagine what Brooke and his idiot flunkies will be saying if he ever beat a legitimate top 20 fighter? No, Shawn Porter whoever that is does not count.
    How can Porter not be top 20 when he was a reigning world Champion?

    Comment

    • PunchyPotorff
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 10384
      • 525
      • 1,304
      • 49,687

      #42
      Hearn is just trying to drum up some big moolah for Brook. Both Brook and Khan are good solid boxers, and it would probably be a close fight and would bring in a good payday for both. But right now, if Khan wants to concentrate on getting the Floydie fight hey let's go for it I say. Floydie says he's retiring soon, so IOW the clock is ticking there, whereas Brook isn't retiring anytime soon.

      And I think it's ridiculous to say Brook would KO Khan. From what I've seen, there is some truth that Khan's chin is much improved in this new weight division he's in. I'd be all for Brook/Khan AFTER Floydie/Khan and Floydie/Pac happen.

      Comment

      • JACK1190
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2013
        • 2290
        • 61
        • 50
        • 9,159

        #43
        Originally posted by Uklad
        Yep mate.

        I think Eddie means Khan doesn't want it.

        Why would he say too big? Kell is the bigger fighter, so obviously he means Khan won't want the fight, which he doesn't and Kell is too big which he's said before. That video has been twisted.

        Comment

        • VG_Addict
          king meat's twin
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2012
          • 5618
          • 237
          • 3
          • 53,380

          #44
          Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
          Hearn is just trying to drum up some big moolah for Brook. Both Brook and Khan are good solid boxers, and it would probably be a close fight and would bring in a good payday for both. But right now, if Khan wants to concentrate on getting the Floydie fight hey let's go for it I say. Floydie says he's retiring soon, so IOW the clock is ticking there, whereas Brook isn't retiring anytime soon.

          And I think it's ridiculous to say Brook would KO Khan. From what I've seen, there is some truth that Khan's chin is much improved in this new weight division he's in. I'd be all for Brook/Khan AFTER Floydie/Khan and Floydie/Pac happen.
          Khan's chin hasn't improved. Neither Collazo nor Alexander are big punchers.

          Comment

          • brettWall
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 6625
            • 686
            • 220
            • 18,355

            #45
            This Brook team is too focused on Khan. The proper thing to do is win more meaningful fights and forget about Khan. The problem is they think they might lose and the Khan fight will be gone forever.

            Comment

            • Black Barty
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 1497
              • 57
              • 0
              • 7,795

              #46
              Hearn is full of sh.it on this one. The only reason anyone takes his nonsense seriously is because it's Khan he is trashing, and as we all know, everyone loves to hate Khan.

              Khan. wants. to. fight. Floyd. in. may. Is that so hard to understand? The money argument is ridiculous. Khan is not a broke up-and-comer, he's already loaded. Money isn't everything to him. And besides, he can always fight Brook after Floyd.

              If the situation were reversed, Hearn wouldn't consider Khan vs Brook such a must-have fight.

              Comment

              • Ham Porter
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2013
                • 2552
                • 242
                • 51
                • 9,574

                #47
                Hearn has repeatedly stated that Mayweather should/would take top priority over anything else. He's saying that Khan has to fight Brook if he doesn't get the Mayweather fight.


                Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
                Won't be the first time ratings were daft. The little-talent bull-rusher Porter beats the way limited Alexander... then beats the extremely shot and never was anything Pauli.... and Brook beats the bull-rusher easily. Tell us how Porter was special?

                Guy I was responding to was trying to argue that Porter wasn't a top twenty welterweight.

                Comment

                • bojangles1987
                  bo jungle
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 41118
                  • 1,326
                  • 357
                  • 63,028

                  #48
                  If Khan doesn't fight Mayweather or Pacquiao, Brook is the best fight for him.

                  Comment

                  • brettWall
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 6625
                    • 686
                    • 220
                    • 18,355

                    #49
                    Thurman is available.

                    Comment

                    • Weebler I
                      El Weeblerito I
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 31092
                      • 1,459
                      • 1,648
                      • 54,550

                      #50
                      Hearn is not really helping his case saying this stuff.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP