Golovkin hasn't fought anyone? But Stevens, Macklin, Proksa, Geale, and Rubio were all top 10 contenders when GGG fought them.
Are you trying to sell his opponents or highlight his lack of good opposition?
If you're trying to sell him and his opponents, that's a bad way of doing so, because putting up a list of his best is literally the worst possible thing you can do because it just highlights how truly terrible his opposition is and has been for a now veteran 33 year old, 31 fight world champion with about 15 title defenses over 4 years.
When the best fighter you've ever faced as a 33 year old, 4 year veteran world champion with 15 or so title defenses, and 31 fights over a near decade long career, is Daniel Geale....you've got issues.
GGG might of already faced Andre Ward if all these other champions didn't take so fucking long to sack up and contribute to Golovkin's crowning as Undisputed Middleweight Champion.
Its crazy to think Golovkin is the Interim WBC champion who is fighting Murray the WBC Silver champion? Ridiculous stuff.
What makes you think they'll eventually fight him? I think he's pretty much wasting his time at 160. If the Canelo/Cotto winner doesn't fight him then I think he should move up right away.
It would be a good fight. You never knew with Jones, he could look stylistically lost and like he was just wasting time then whip out some crazy punch and end it right there. Whether he planned it all along or just relied on his freak speed to rescue him, only he truly knows.
Both he and Golovkin's legacies will suffer from (comparatively) weak opponents but Jones did that all the way to heavyweight and Golovkin seems content to rule 160 (I choose to ignore the current Jones who is really bringing his career down every time he fights).
It's a very tough fight to call. It would basically come down to Golovkin trying to cut him down and Jones looking for holes in Golovkin's defense - and how well Golovkin retained composure after inevitably tasting that speed.
Are you trying to sell his opponents or highlight his lack of good opposition?
If you're trying to sell him and his opponents, that's a bad way of doing so, because putting up a list of his best is literally the worst possible thing you can do because it just highlights how truly terrible his opposition is and has been for a now veteran 33 year old, 31 fight world champion with about 15 title defenses over 4 years.
When the best fighter you've ever faced as a 33 year old, 4 year veteran world champion with 15 or so title defenses, and 31 fights over a near decade long career, is Daniel Geale....you've got issues.
It would be a good fight. You never knew with Jones, he could look stylistically lost and like he was just wasting time then whip out some crazy punch and end it right there. Whether he planned it all along or just relied on his freak speed to rescue him, only he truly knows.
Both he and Golovkin's legacies will suffer from (comparatively) weak opponents but Jones did that all the way to heavyweight and Golovkin seems content to rule 160 (I choose to ignore the current Jones who is really bringing his career down every time he fights).
It's a very tough fight to call. It would basically come down to Golovkin trying to cut him down and Jones looking for holes in Golovkin's defense - and how well Golovkin retained composure after inevitably tasting that speed.
Jones fought much better opposition than Golovkin. You can't seriously make that comparison.
olovkin is the real deal and im a massive fan, even bought the GGG Tshirts but WOAH Lets slow down fella's - His Royness!? Already!? Y'all musta forgot after all! Roy operated in a different time zone altogether and would be lighting GGG up with triples and quadruples!
Comment