Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Khan-Brook Can Draw 100,000 Fans in UK

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fetta
    nob cheese
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 16696
    • 417
    • 3
    • 24,315

    #71
    I think it can

    Comment

    • Box-Office
      Russo Guy
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2013
      • 7620
      • 245
      • 483
      • 14,068

      #72
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Number 3 since Khan clearly made it a priority to get the Peterson rematch since he signed for it which you refuse to acknowledge. Khan wanted a Garcia rematch but Danny's father said he wouldn't grant him one.

      How you manage to portion all the blame onto Khan is quite staggering. It shows brand new levels of commitment to your obsession.

      Do you post in anything other than Khan threads? Serious question...
      He is alright. You should see that thack guy. Quite pitiful really.
      Last edited by Box-Office; 12-09-2014, 01:32 PM.

      Comment

      • Wicky
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2012
        • 1071
        • 27
        • 2
        • 7,631

        #73
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Number 3 since Khan clearly made it a priority to get the Peterson rematch since he signed for it which you refuse to acknowledge. Khan wanted a Garcia rematch but Danny's father said he wouldn't grant him one.

        How you manage to portion all the blame onto Khan is quite staggering. It shows brand new levels of commitment to your obsession.

        Do you post in anything other than Khan threads? Serious question...
        That’s a lot of words for a simple question. You say #3 is factually incorrect even though out of 3 losses he has not avenged a single one. Interesting point of view.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #74
          Originally posted by Wicky
          That’s a lot of words for a simple question. You say #3 is factually incorrect even though out of 3 losses he has not avenged a single one. Interesting point of view.
          Sometimes fights don't just fall into place especially when little things like failed drug tests get in the way.

          But carry on, everyone can see through your propaganda anyway. Just like how Khan "killed" someone...lol. You and Alex Guinness should make a club....wait, you already have one, don't you?

          Comment

          • Box-Office
            Russo Guy
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2013
            • 7620
            • 245
            • 483
            • 14,068

            #75
            Originally posted by alexguiness
            So, using your logic the only people who dislike Amir Khan are...

            Low IQ Commoners!

            It would have nothing to do with the fact that most people in the UK are either indifferent to Khan or just find him extremely annoying.

            I would suggest that Khan's biggest fan base is with young, uneducated, UK Pakistani males in the larger Northern towns and cities.

            Most people don't hate Khan, they just don't care about him at all.

            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            I didn't say the only people but the vast majority. They're the kind of people who would boo someone like Carl Froch - the man got booed in his hometown after everything he has done for that place.

            The type of Arsenal fans who would boo and hurl abuse at Arsene Wenger after all he's done for the club. Scum, gutter ****.

            I think it's quite obvious why you don't like Khan from the insinuations that he only achieved fame because he's Pakistani. And now another reference to Pakistanis. I'm not Pakistani or uneducated or Nothern.

            Khan is admired by many people in the UK for representing the country in the Olympics at 17 years old as Britain's only boxer. For going to America to fly the flag abroad and win world titles. For his charity work outside of boxing.

            The UK population stretches beyond these sporting events which attract riff-raff like yourself.
            Does make constant references towards his ethnicity. It's like in his head all the time, so it doesn't take long for him to let it out. Not pointing anything in specific, but really makes you think.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #76
              Originally posted by Box-Office
              Does make constant references towards his ethnicity. It's like in his head all the time, so it doesn't take long for him to let it out. Not pointing anything in specific, but really makes you think.
              Yep him and this Wicky kid are very suspect.

              He was in another thread talking about how Khan keeps his wife locked in a cupboard and about how Khan "keeps his wife fully clothed".

              Pretty obvious what this stems from. These guys are obsessed.

              Comment

              • Wicky
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2012
                • 1071
                • 27
                • 2
                • 7,631

                #77
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                Sometimes fights don't just fall into place especially when little things like failed drug tests get in the way.

                But carry on, everyone can see through your propaganda anyway. Just like how Khan "killed" someone...lol. You and Alex Guinness should make a club....wait, you already have one, don't you?
                So, you don’t understand what "facts" are. Obvious really.
                One more time for clarity:
                1. Do multiple unavenged defeats damage a fighters rep? Yes.
                2. Has Khan lost multiple times? Yes.
                3. Could he have set the record straight? Yes.
                4. Has he? No.
                5. Is this the behaviour of "one of the best of all time"? No.


                Hmmm...
                sounds like hype to me, but you believe what you like.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Wicky
                  So, you don’t understand what "facts" are. Obvious really.
                  One more time for clarity:
                  1. Do multiple unavenged defeats damage a fighters rep? Yes.
                  2. Has Khan lost multiple times? Yes.
                  3. Could he have set the record straight? Yes.
                  4. Has he? No.
                  5. Is this the behaviour of "one of the best of all time"? No.


                  Hmmm...
                  sounds like hype to me, but you believe what you like.
                  When could he have set the record straight? You do know that Peterson failing a drug test and Garcia's father refusing a rematch are things which aren't his fault? Why don't you acknowledge these facts?

                  And this talk of unavenged losses. A lot of top fighters have unavenged losses. Pacquaio, Wlad, Sergio Martinez, Hopkins, Carl Froch.

                  You apply the same questions of them but you won't because you're absolutely obsessed with Khan and Khan only.

                  Comment

                  • alexguiness
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 8169
                    • 396
                    • 44
                    • 50,607

                    #79
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    Sometimes fights don't just fall into place especially when little things like failed drug tests get in the way.

                    But carry on, everyone can see through your propaganda anyway. Just like how Khan "killed" someone...lol. You and Alex Guinness should make a club....wait, you already have one, don't you?
                    No club here.

                    Just try to relax a bit, you are seeing weird KHAN conspiracies everywhere.

                    Too much negativity could lead King Khan to sleepy time.

                    Go in peace.

                    Comment

                    • Wicky
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2012
                      • 1071
                      • 27
                      • 2
                      • 7,631

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      When could he have set the record straight? You do know that Peterson failing a drug test and Garcia's father refusing a rematch are things which aren't his fault? Why don't you acknowledge these facts?

                      And this talk of unavenged losses. A lot of top fighters have unavenged losses. Pacquaio, Wlad, Sergio Martinez, Hopkins, Carl Froch.

                      You apply the same questions of them but you won't because you're absolutely obsessed with Khan and Khan only.
                      Others: Not really. We’re just talking about Khan right now.

                      Peterson is not scheduled to fight anyone at the moment. So that fight could have been made right now instead of Devon. Don’t bother mentioning the 7lbs weight difference. Fighters choose catch weight all the time when they want to make the fight happen. This isn’t about belts or divisions, it’s about pride and setting the record straight.

                      Following Khan’s vicious KO by Danny, Angel said he wouldn’t give Khan a rematch meaning that Khan wasn’t entitled. If the money was right, and Khan accepted that he’s the b-side of that fight (to the much more popular current champion) that fight could easily be made too.

                      The facts remain that facts:
                      1. Do multiple unavenged defeats damage a fighters rep? Yes.
                      2. Has Khan lost multiple times? Yes.
                      3. Could he have set the record straight? Yes.
                      4. Has he? No.
                      5. Is this the behaviour of "one of the best of all time"? No.


                      Now, dry you tears and move on little man, you just got schooled again.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP