To all those who say Wladdy is best HW ever etc

[Ogecca MaMa]

Lmao, in what way does he fund them?
How much did they even fund them, haha 270'000 euros... which has been spent to protect their military personnel with better weapons, armour and so on big deal.
They didn't invest in the army buying shells, aircrafts or tanks so what is your point.

so supporting **** party is not enough for you I guess. Even if they didn't give any money, they are betrayers

[yoz]

Well, swimming is much better form of cardio than running. It engages all major muscle groups plus it doesn't put stress on your joints.

This ^.

[Beercules]

Who here says Wlad is the best HW

[beez721]

Who here says Wlad is the best HW

I don't think even the biggest nuthugger has called wlad the greatest of all time. I personally think hes top 10 but definitely not top 5

[Jedi Vader]

Math. Math. Math.

What matters is the numbers, not the names AT THIS POINT. We're done playing those games. The names have become subjective to the point where wins over the likes of Pulev are even criticized. This is of course opinion.



Title defenses, records of opponents are the only reliable data at this point. The criticism against Fury and Wilder are already waiting in the wings once they're beaten. What matters is that a 32-0, 32 ko's record will be 32-1 once Wlad is done with this prime, 6'7 opponent.

[StefanTosic]

No, you don't have to beat ATGs to become an ATG. But it is true that your worth/rating is determined by your competition.

That's what I'm saying. My point is he can beat 50 more guys on Lepai's level and it would do nothing for him to be listed higher so you can give up trying to persuade me that Vlad's the one of the greatest HW ever... (just to be clear I'm NOT talking to you D-MiZe but the other guy)

[Mr.Fantastic]

Hardly anyone credible that is a Wlad fan ranks him as the best HW ever. All we want is for Wlad to get the equal credit for the same standards.

[LacedUp]

Yes, it is. Your stamina and muscle strenght improve plus you don't put yourself in risk of unneccessary injury.

It most definitely is not

There's no two ways about it. I'm not saying swimming is not a good exercise, but it does not give you what running gives you when it comes to boxing.

[Hype job]

It most definitely is not

There's no two ways about it. I'm not saying swimming is not a good exercise, but it does not give you what running gives you when it comes to boxing.

No, he is right.

You are wrong.

[LacedUp]

No, he is right.

You are wrong.

No I'm right.

Swimming is a low impact endurance exercise, that focuses more on your upper body than your legs, whereas running will focus on your legs. Also, because you aren't weightless in a boxing ring, your legs will tire quickly if they aren't running on a regular basis.

Running and jumping rope can be supplemented with swimming, but if you're a boxer it's a bad idea to reverse it.