Most of the people putting Wlad at the top are talking about "head to head" along with guys like Lewis because they would be so imposing for older fighters.
Several have better resumes in a traditional ranking context.
It's like an argument nobody ever has but everyone always feels the need to "debunk" anyway.
Someone may believe Hopkins or Golovkin could have beaten SRR but that doesn't mean they're ranking those guys above him in resume.
It's all pretty circular and pointless anyway IMO. Nobody ever has their mind changed very much by anyone else.
If Wladimir goes unbeaten through 2015 beating the likes of Jennings, Wilder/Stiverne and maybe also Fury what then...?
Even when he is winning he is losing because he will always have people trying to criticize his every move.
If Wladimir goes unbeaten through 2015 beating the likes of Jennings, Wilder/Stiverne and maybe also Fury what then...?
Even when he is winning he is losing because he will always have people trying to criticize his every move.
a winner over fellow atg jennings and hall of famer stiverne will surely see him ranked GOAT
Comment