Why he wouldn't? Argue it!
I think that's clear that Danny is shot when he has to force the action and Crawford himself is a defensively sound, technical fighter with good footwork and strong jab. He can also force the action and exchange if he wants but he is also very good at adjust so against Garcia who is a well known dangerous counter puncher, he wouldn't attack at any price, he would outbox Garcia from the outside and he also wouldn't be embrassed if Garcia would force him into a brawl which is by the way unlikely as I said before, cause Garcia isn't good at forcing the action and cutting off the ring. I don't say that Dany isn't a good fighter but Crawford is also very good and stylewise he is all wrong for Danny, while Danny imo isn't bad for Crawford. If Herrera gave hell to Danny (I had it a draw but still...) Crawford (who I think is a better boxer than Herrera) will outpoint Danny if they will meet.
So why you think that Danny would win?
I think that's clear that Danny is shot when he has to force the action and Crawford himself is a defensively sound, technical fighter with good footwork and strong jab. He can also force the action and exchange if he wants but he is also very good at adjust so against Garcia who is a well known dangerous counter puncher, he wouldn't attack at any price, he would outbox Garcia from the outside and he also wouldn't be embrassed if Garcia would force him into a brawl which is by the way unlikely as I said before, cause Garcia isn't good at forcing the action and cutting off the ring. I don't say that Dany isn't a good fighter but Crawford is also very good and stylewise he is all wrong for Danny, while Danny imo isn't bad for Crawford. If Herrera gave hell to Danny (I had it a draw but still...) Crawford (who I think is a better boxer than Herrera) will outpoint Danny if they will meet.
So why you think that Danny would win?
Comment