Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Froch: Khan Gets Cleaned Out By Top Level Punchers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Froch is fairly good friends with both David Haye & Kell Brook. Uncommon friendships for a white racist don’t you think? Khan’s fans always get upset when somebody mentions his vulnerabilities. ****** really because he’s obviously fragile and has never been pitted against the tougher opponents. Remember both times Khan got KO’d it was against underdogs. Even feather fisted Devon has a chance of KO-ing Khan.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Wicky View Post
      Froch is fairly good friends with both David Haye & Kell Brook. Uncommon friendships for a white racist don***8217;t you think? Khan***8217;s fans always get upset when somebody mentions his vulnerabilities. ****** really because he***8217;s obviously fragile and has never been pitted against the tougher opponents. Remember both times Khan got KO***8217;d it was against underdogs. Even feather fisted Devon has a chance of KO-ing Khan.
      Who did Khan dodge at 140lbs? The only person who would have possibly been considered a favourite against him was Tim Bradley and we know what happened there.

      Ridiculous criticism yet again.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        Who did Khan dodge at 140lbs? The only person who would have possibly been considered a favourite against him was Tim Bradley and we know what happened there.

        Ridiculous criticism yet again.
        No, we don't all know what happened there. We only know what's been said by muppets like you on a forum. My understanding is that Bradley had contactual issues that stopped him from fighting, maybe you know different because they call you and tell you personally what's really going on. Clown.

        I didn't say he'd dodged anyone. I implied his management take the easiest and least challenging route in terms of avoiding punchers. By punchers I mean people with a significant average KO percentage.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Wicky View Post
          No, we don't all know what happened there. We only know what's been said by muppets like you on a forum. My understanding is that Bradley had contactual issues that stopped him from fighting, maybe you know different because they call you and tell you personally what's really going on. Clown.

          I didn't say he'd dodged anyone. I implied his management take the easiest and least challenging route in terms of avoiding punchers. By punchers I mean people with a significant average KO percentage.
          Marcos Maidana had the highest KO percentage in his weight class

          Bradley was not prevented from fighting. He wanted to sit out his contract and not fight so he could avoid the fight and sign with Top Rank. Whatever you say about his contractual issues doesn't change the fact that Khan offered him the fight more than once and was willing to fight the guy considered the best at his weight. So how has his management taken the easiest route?

          Keep the criticisms of Khan realistic and fair so you don't make yourself look like an absolute dribbling mong.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
            Marcos Maidana had the highest KO percentage in his weight class

            Bradley was not prevented from fighting. He wanted to sit out his contract and not fight so he could avoid the fight and sign with Top Rank. Whatever you say about his contractual issues doesn't change the fact that Khan offered him the fight more than once and was willing to fight the guy considered the best at his weight. So how has his management taken the easiest route?

            Keep the criticisms of Khan realistic and fair so you don't make yourself look like a fool.
            @ Dirk Tiddler

            Maidana was mandatory. ODLH didn't want the fight for Khan and publicly said so, but couldn't avoid it. Khan won a highly contentious victory, but without the ref's help most unbiased boxing fans agree he would have lost. A rematch was mentioned to clear things up which would have been massive and made great business sense. Khan opted to steer clear of that lucrative opportunity instead fighting little known Lightweight McCloskey at 1/9 odds.

            Peterson & Garcia were hand picked to loose as confirmed by the bookmakers. Both caused an upset. Every other opponent was old, past their best or never had a best. No hungry dogs like Thurman, Porter, Brook in recent fights. Instead he's fought the likes of Molina, Dias & Collazo. Not exactly the top tier are they?

            I say easy route, you say not. That's cool. There's no need to keep talking shhit, just answer a simple question...

            Who's Khan fought where the experts & bookmakers agree it's a 50/50 fight; when did that last happen?
            Last edited by Wicky; 11-25-2014, 07:48 PM.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Wicky View Post
              @ Dirk Tiddler

              Maidana was mandatory. ODLH didn't want the fight for Khan and publicly said so, but couldn't avoid it. Khan won a highly contentious victory, but without the ref's help most unbiased boxing fans agree he would have lost. A rematch was mentioned to clear things up which would have been massive and made great business sense. Khan opted to steer clear of that lucrative opportunity instead fighting little known Lightweight McCloskey at 1/9 odds.

              Peterson & Garcia were hand picked to loose as confirmed by the bookmakers. Both caused an upset. Every other opponent was old, past their best or never had a best. No hungry dogs like Thurman, Porter, Brook in recent fights. Instead he's fought the likes of Molina, Dias & Collazo. Not exactly the top tier are they?

              I say easy route, you say not. That's cool. There's no need to keep talking shhit, just answer a simple question...

              Who's Khan fought where the experts & bookmakers agree it's a 50/50 fight; when did that last happen?
              The only person that may have been favoured to beat Khan at 140lbs by the bookmakers is Tim Bradley and he turned down the fight. So you aren't saying very much at all.

              Whether Maidana was the mandatory or not. Khan still fought him. That fight took place so how can you say he's avoided punchers or his management have taken the easy route? Oscar De La Hoya is powerful enough not to have his hand forced by anyone and even if he did, it would be quite easy for Khan to have given up the title and cherry picked another title. Khan didn't need a belt with the GBP machine behind him.

              Like I said, your criticism is absolutely pathetic and unjust.

              Comment


              • #87
                wicky stop being a ****

                ur hate for khan clouds ur vision

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
                  wicky stop being a ****

                  ur hate for khan clouds ur vision
                  What is this "Khan has never fought someone who the bookies favour" **** that I keep reading? It's like the new party line for these idiots. Khan would have been favourite over everyone, possibly even Tim Bradley who rejected the fight with him.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    **** Khan, he deserves to get alot of ahit talked about him. Khan never shuts up, Froch telling it how it is. Froch was not Schooled by kessler or dirrell lmao

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Nothing like Froch, pointing out the obvious. lolz

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP