Comments Thread For: Froch: Khan Gets Cleaned Out By Top Level Punchers

[Wicky]

The only person that may have been favoured to beat Khan at 140lbs by the bookmakers is Tim Bradley and he turned down the fight. So you aren't saying very much at all.

Whether Maidana was the mandatory or not. Khan still fought him. That fight took place so how can you say he's avoided punchers or his management have taken the easy route? Oscar De La Hoya is powerful enough not to have his hand forced by anyone and even if he did, it would be quite easy for Khan to have given up the title and cherry picked another title. Khan didn't need a belt with the GBP machine behind him.

Like I said, your criticism is absolutely pathetic and unjust.

Mandatory means compulsory, as in “not to be avoided”. You get that, right? Actually, you probably don't. Get somebody to explain the concept.

As for your obsession Bradley, don’t limit yourself. I’m not just talking about Khan's championship run @ 140. I'll rephrase the question to make it even easier for you…

Who has Khan opted to fight IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER where he wasn't the favourite to win? Name one single fight.

I know you’ll want to keep on arguing but this is a really simple question. Whenever his management have chosen the opponent, Khan has been matched against fighters who are expected to loose. That’s cherry picking plain & simple… and even with those odds he’s still lost 10 percent of his fights !!!

You say Khan would be the favourite over anybody. Thurman, Porter, Brook, Matthysse, Garcia rematch, Maidana rematch… etc? Maybe. maybe not.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Mandatory means compulsory, as in ***8220;not to be avoided***8221;. You get that, right? Actually, you probably don't. Get somebody to explain the concept.

As for your obsession Bradley, don***8217;t limit yourself. I***8217;m not just talking about Khan's championship run @ 140. I'll rephrase the question to make it even easier for you***8230;

Who has Khan opted to fight IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER where he wasn't the favourite to win? Name one single fight.

I know you***8217;ll want to keep on arguing but this is a really simple question. Whenever his management have chosen the opponent, Khan has been matched against fighters who are expected to loose. That***8217;s cherry picking plain & simple***8230; and even with those odds he***8217;s still lost 10 percent of his fights !!!

You say Khan would be the favourite over anybody. Thurman, Porter, Brook, Matthysse, Garcia rematch, Maidana rematch***8230; etc? Maybe. maybe not.

You do know that fighters have dropped their titles rather than face their mandatories? You do know this has occurred, right? It occurred recently with Peter Quillin and Korobov. It occurred when Lennox Lewis was Mike Tyson's mandatory? Learn about some boxing history, maybe?

For Khan's entire career, he would have been favourite over everyone expect perhaps Tim Bradley. That's the bottom line so you're saying absolutely *** all when you say he hasn't chosen to fight anyone who he hasn't been favoured against. I mean he chose to fight Bradley. He currently wants to fight Mayweather/Pacquaio. Those are the only guys he'd be heavily favoured against.

How can it be cherry picking when you're the number 2 guy in your division and only one man is favoured to beat you and that one man REFUSES to fight you? What a horrific argument. You are making a right **** of yourself here.

And I have news for you, he'd be favourite against Brook, Thurman, Porter etc. Garcia would be close to 50/50. It would depend what bookies you went to. It really is one of the lamest arguments I've ever read on here.

[Wicky]

Khan would have been favourite over everyone.

Yeah.... Not brain dead at all.

I’m gonna bow out of this now. Can’t be arsed wasting time arguing with a ******. You’re not going to answer the question & name somebody because they don’t exist. End of.

Khan’s management have never deliberately put him in the ring with a difficult challenge because he's talented but extremely fragile. His opponents have all been hand picked for fanboys like you to have wank posters on your bedroom wall. Enjoy… don’t forget to clean up after.

That list of names: Thurman, Porter, Brook, Matthysse, Garcia rematch, Maidana rematch. Whatever it is you want to say next, just go back and look at that list of names.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yeah.... Not brain dead at all.

I***8217;m gonna bow out of this now. Can***8217;t be arsed wasting time arguing with a ******. You***8217;re not going to answer the question & name somebody because they don***8217;t exist. End of.

Khan***8217;s management have never deliberately put him in the ring with a difficult challenge because he's talented but extremely fragile. His opponents have all been hand picked for fanboys like you to have wank posters on your bedroom wall. Enjoy***8230; don***8217;t forget to clean up after.

That list of names: Thurman, Porter, Brook, Matthysse, Garcia rematch, Maidana rematch. Whatever it is you want to say next, just go back and look at that list of names.

Haha you've been absolutely slaughtered so you resort to selectively quoting.

The only person who Khan would have been the underdog against was Bradley at 140lbs and he agreed to fight Bradley so once again, how has he been carefully matched or had hand-picked opponents? That means every opponent was hand-picked except Bradley who REFUSED to fight him.

He's had one fight at 147lbs . How can you judge him by his welterweight career when he's had 1 fight at the weight?

Until the next thread when I publicly humiliate you again.

[LacedUp]

@ Dirk Tiddler

Maidana was mandatory. ODLH didn't want the fight for Khan and publicly said so, but couldn't avoid it. Khan won a highly contentious victory, but without the ref's help most unbiased boxing fans agree he would have lost. A rematch was mentioned to clear things up which would have been massive and made great business sense. Khan opted to steer clear of that lucrative opportunity instead fighting little known Lightweight McCloskey at 1/9 odds.

Peterson & Garcia were hand picked to loose as confirmed by the bookmakers. Both caused an upset. Every other opponent was old, past their best or never had a best. No hungry dogs like Thurman, Porter, Brook in recent fights. Instead he's fought the likes of Molina, Dias & Collazo. Not exactly the top tier are they?

I say easy route, you say not. That's cool. There's no need to keep talking shhit, just answer a simple question...

Who's Khan fought where the experts & bookmakers agree it's a 50/50 fight; when did that last happen?

Actually, Maidana was a voluntary defence.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Actually, Maidana was a voluntary defence.

It wasn't, it was a mandatory. It's actually completely irrelevant because they made the fight. If Khan had dropped his belt and dodged that fight, the spastic might have a point but the fight took place.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Does he actually think someone like Thurman would be favoured over Khan at the bookmakers? Whether it's right or wrong, Khan would be favoured by most bookmakers because no one knows who Thurman is. That's why it's such a pathetic argument but this is what these people cling to.

[LacedUp]

It wasn't, it was a mandatory. It's actually completely irrelevant because they made the fight. If Khan had dropped his belt and dodged that fight, the spastic might have a point but the fight took place.

No it wasn't. Maidana was heading into a mandatory position but Khan fought him as a voluntary and then fought that irish southpaw as mandatory.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No it wasn't. Maidana was heading into a mandatory position but Khan fought him as a voluntary and then fought that irish southpaw as mandatory.

Salita was his first mandatory. He got rid of him and took a voluntary against Malignaggi. Then Maidana was the next mandatory. McCloskey was never mandatory - just a warmup for the Bradley fight which Bradley turned down.

[LacedUp]

Salita was his first mandatory. He got rid of him and took a voluntary against Malignaggi. Then Maidana was the next mandatory. McCloskey was never mandatory - just a warmup for the Bradley fight which Bradley turned down.

You might be right about McCloskey, but i'm almost 100% certain that the WBA had not actually called for a mandatory fight.

I'll check up on it.