Pacquiao Vs. Naseem Hamed

[legacyofbrutality]

Hey runwknives, so u were just kidding about pacquiao being a clown right? just cuz he lost early in his career to rustico, and singsurat? cuz if pacquiao was a clown then that would make people look at guys like Morales and Barrera different cuz they both lost to that "clown". Bottom line is the Prince lost to Barrera and Pacquiao won against Barrera thats a good measure to who's a better fighter.

[Run]

Hey runwknives, so u were just kidding about pacquiao being a clown right?

Pacquiao is not a clown. He's an excellent fighter.

just cuz he lost early in his career to rustico, and singsurat? .

Yeah that is pretty sad IMO.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[EXIGE]

Hey runwknives, so u were just kidding about pacquiao being a clown right? just cuz he lost early in his career to rustico, and singsurat? cuz if pacquiao was a clown then that would make people look at guys like Morales and Barrera different cuz they both lost to that "clown". Bottom line is the Prince lost to Barrera and Pacquiao won against Barrera thats a good measure to who's a better fighter.

Christ, the level of ignorance is so ****ing high...

Pac beats Barrerra and Barrera beat Naz so Pac is better than Naz?

Sorry, but #1 rule. Triangular logic doesnt work. If triangular logic works, then Naz is better than Morales just on the fighters they both beat and what both of them did to their opponents. Ill give you an example:

Naz KO Daniel Molina 2.
Eric Morales TKO Daniel Molina 6.

Naz is better than Eric Morales using your logic then?

Also rocco said that Naz cant take pressure fighters. ****ing hell, Rocco, you havent seen a Naz fight have you? He thrived on pressure fighters, and dismantled them when they pressured him. Ill give you an example aswell...

Wilfredo Vazquez -- usually boxes. Didnt box/pressure against Naz, because he knew that if he did, he would get taken out even earlier than he did...

If Naz can get back to full fitness, strength and reflex then he will take Pac apart, I assure you of that.

[Run]

Christ, the level of ignorance is so ****ing high...

Pac beats Barrerra and Barrera beat Naz so Pac is better than Naz?

Sorry, but #1 rule. Triangular logic doesnt work. If triangular logic works, then Naz is better than Morales just on the fighters they both beat and what both of them did to their opponents. Ill give you an example:

Naz KO Daniel Molina 2.
Eric Morales TKO Daniel Molina 6.

Naz is better than Eric Morales using your logic then?

Also rocco said that Naz cant take pressure fighters. ****ing hell, Rocco, you havent seen a Naz fight have you? He thrived on pressure fighters, and dismantled them when they pressured him. Ill give you an example aswell...

Wilfredo Vazquez -- usually boxes. Didnt box/pressure against Naz, because he knew that if he did, he would get taken out even earlier than he did...

If Naz can get back to full fitness, strength and reflex then he will take Pac apart, I assure you of that.

I've been so lazy to type lately...and have resorted to merely one liners; albeit halfwit ones at that.

But I should have entered this thread and typed the exact same thing Exig3 just did....because it's so correct it's not even funny. Triangular logic doesn't work,

And Naz is the man.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[EXIGE]

I've been so lazy to type lately...and have resorted to merely one liners; albeit halfwit ones at that.

But I should have entered this thread and typed the exact same thing Exig3 just did....because it's so correct it's not even funny. Triangular logic doesn't work,

And Naz is the man.

I think you are the only American/Mexican on these boards that feels the same way I do about Naz... Ok he lost to Barrerra but he also beat a lot of fighters. (I could make 100 valid excuses about the Barrerra fight, but I cant be bothered anymore. People just think I am lieing when I do that, so I will just say Barrerra beat him fair and square).

The main thing I am worried about with Naz is that he will lose his reflexes which he relied on for defence basically, so that could be crucial. Other than that he can retain some of his power and speed, and I dont care what anyone says, he has more power than Pac....

EDIT: The dude who said Naz was in his prime when he lost to Barrerra. I wont even try and argue with you. If you had the capacity to type that in the first place, you certainetly dont have the capacity to understand that Naz was far from his prime in that fight.

[legacyofbrutality]

**** chill man its just my opinion, of course I know that kind of thinking doesnt work all the time, i think pacquiao can beat Naz but not because he beat barrera. I think pacquiao can beat naz because naz leaves himself open to shots and when he gets tagged he gets shaken up because his balance is bad I think if Pacquiao catches him he's going down

[EXIGE]

**** chill man its just my opinion, of course I know that kind of thinking doesnt work all the time, i think pacquiao can beat Naz but not because he beat barrera. I think pacquiao can beat naz because naz leaves himself open to shots and when he gets tagged he gets shaken up because his balance is bad I think if Pacquiao catches him he's going down

Give me 3 examples of when he has been shaken up.

Do you know how many times he has been knocked down, and do you know the shots he has been put down with?

Compare that to the jabs that Pac gets put down with and you will see what im getting at.

[benalawson]

Man I feel sorry for people that have to defend a ***** like naz

[moy22487]

I think you are the only American/Mexican on these boards that feels the same way I do about Naz... Ok he lost to Barrerra but he also beat a lot of fighters. (I could make 100 valid excuses about the Barrerra fight, but I cant be bothered anymore. People just think I am lieing when I do that, so I will just say Barrerra beat him fair and square).

The main thing I am worried about with Naz is that he will lose his reflexes which he relied on for defence basically, so that could be crucial. Other than that he can retain some of his power and speed, and I dont care what anyone says, he has more power than Pac....

EDIT: The dude who said Naz was in his prime when he lost to Barrerra. I wont even try and argue with you. If you had the capacity to type that in the first place, you certainetly dont have the capacity to understand that Naz was far from his prime in that fight.

if he would of won would you still say that he was past his prime?

[legacyofbrutality]

Give me 3 examples of when he has been shaken up.

Do you know how many times he has been knocked down, and do you know the shots he has been put down with?

Compare that to the jabs that Pac gets put down with and you will see what im getting at.

I do know he's gotten dropped by some of Kevin Kelley's shots, and MAB rocked him as well, didnt put him down but MAB's shots shook him a little. I just think that the way Naz leans back with his hands down is something pacquiao can take advantage of with some fast lunging shots. But its all a moot point really cuz even if Naz comes back and Pacquiao beats him, it wouldnt be a very impressive victory cuz Naz is like 34 years old.