What did Torrecampo and Singsurat do to Manny then?
Yikes.
Ahh. And so you make another illogical post. You will eat your words again.
Naz was a clown, a quitter and a fake. He was just a fighter who was setup against opponents whom he can easily beat and in such a way as to make it look he was an elite. When it was time to step up against MAB, he got his ass handed to him big time.
If Naz wasn't a quitter then he would have picked himself up and proved to the world, if not for himself that his loss to MAB was just 1 loss and that he can rebound from it.
The problem is, the guy retired in frustration.
Owned?? lol!
The difference between PAC and NAz is that PAC aint a *****-quitter. The losses to this fighters made PAC a better fighter and that he improved on his game.
If Naz wasn't a quitter then he would have picked himself up and proved to the world, if not for himself that his loss to MAB was just 1 loss and that he can rebound from it.
The problem is, the guy retired in frustration.
Owned?? lol!
The difference between PAC and NAz is that PAC aint a *****-quitter. The losses to this fighters made PAC a better fighter and that he improved on his game.
WHat can you say for your Naz?
At least Naz never lost to guys who push hand carts for a living.
What did Torrecampo and Singsurat do to Manny then?
Yikes.
can't you do better than that? his first loss to torrecampo was more than 10 years ago, a year after manny turned pro. he was still a newcomer and paid the price coz of his immaturity. but he bounced fast and strong after that fight. the lost to singsurat almost seven years ago was a result of dehydrating himself just to make weight and lost the belt even before he made his way to the ring. however, like a true warrior manny is, he picked up his pieces and moved on. look where he is now. naz on the other hand after mab exposed the clown and overrated fighter in him has been nowhere to find. courage, resiliency and fighting spirit are what separate the great and the mediocre my friend.
can't you do better than that? his first loss to torrecampo was more than 10 years ago, a year after manny turned pro. he was still a newcomer and paid the price coz of his immaturity. but he bounced fast and strong after that fight. the lost to singsurat almost seven years ago was a result of dehydrating himself just to make weight and lost the belt even before he made his way to the ring. however, like a true warrior manny is, he picked up his pieces and moved on. look where he is now. naz on the other hand after mab exposed the clown and overrated fighter in him has been nowhere to find. courage, resiliency and fighting spirit are what separate the great and the mediocre my friend.
Exposed?
Like I said. Getting knocked out by guys who operate a confection stand is getting "Exposed".
Not by losing 1 fight to one of the greatest fighters of our generation.
He got rocked by Barerra and you think Hamed would come even close to having a chance against Pacquiao? Pacquiao's pressure would devistate Hamed, we saw what happened in the Barerra fight so really..
At least Naz never lost to guys who push hand carts for a living.
that reply there says it all...those losses were part of his journey to greatness. the number of times you fall doesn't matter but how you pick yourself up from those falls and learned from them. again where manny and naz right now speaks loudly who really is the better warrior between them.
that reply there says it all...those losses were part of his journey to greatness. the number of times you fall doesn't matter but how you pick yourself up from those falls and learned from them. again where manny and naz right now speaks loudly who really is the better warrior between them.
Comment