all the guys predicting hopkins UD win

[Check_hooks]

The problem with that prediction was that some people thought Kovalev was only a puncher. He had over 200 amateur fights. Kovalev is an elite boxer who can **** upstair and downstairs

And BHops face was lumped up at the post fight press conference more than I've ever seen

[LouIE G]

How was it the logical choice if he lost??????

were not talking post fight mr bieber, were talking pre fight... think of this,hopkins: a fighter who has defied odds many times who was old 15 years ago, still competing at he highest level against younger guys who are percieved to be the divisions best to offer at the age of 49, whos has never been koed in his illustrious career, pitted against a fighter in kovalev: who has never faced a fighter in his whole25 fight career, who can match the resume and experiance of a bernard hopkins, not campillo not cleverly not anyone and is supposed to ko a fighter who has never been koed and has one of the greatest chins in boxing??? and bhop is by decision would not be the logical choice, rather then a kovalev ko???

[mlac]

don't bother arguing with him he is clearly a troll / tard / trolltard

[LouIE G]

You really need to relax. Look at how Hopkins looked.

He respected Kovalev the whole fight. The way he looked between rounds was like

im not dis*****g this at all,this is about trying to call out people who picked hopkins by decision here, how is that a bad choice???? there are 267 posters who believed in kovas power and were let down because it went 12 rounds.... but nobody is making threads about that, like this clown..

[Luilun]

need to be called out.

there were ALOT of you

where are you now ?

some really embarrassing things being said, which concludes the fact that most of you don't know **** about boxing.

had you even seen kovalev before?

Just look at the thread before yours the guy talking about Ward that's their new thread yet Ward sucks down to 168 to avoid 175

[////]

were not talking post fight mr bieber, were talking pre fight... think of this,hopkins: a fighter who has defied odds many times who was old 15 years ago, still competing at he highest level against younger guys who are percieved to be the divisions best to offer at the age of 49, whos has never been koed in his illustrious career, pitted against a fighter in kovalev: who has never faced a fighter in his whole25 fight career, who can match the resume and experiance of a bernard hopkins, not campillo not cleverly not anyone and is supposed to ko a fighter who has never been koed and has one of the greatest chins in boxing??? and bhop is by decision would not be the logical choice, rather then a kovalev ko???

So what you're saying is that even though Hopkins lost and your prediction was incorrect, the "logic" you used in generating the prediction was so historically sound that you are vindicated by being completely wrong, because in the process the pattern you noticed turned out to be a non-pattern?

That makes so much sense. Sorry I questioned you.

[Russian Crushin]

it doesnt matter, jones, tarver, trinidad, de lahoya(who cares about his mw run)and was still picked by alot of people to ko hopkins,pavlik, pascal, dawson alll fighters who can punch.......thats more then 1 or 2, if my math is correct.

Still doesnt make Calzaghe a massive puncher. He's no Winky, now thats a puncher

[LouIE G]

don't bother arguing with him he is clearly a troll / tard / trolltard

who the *** are you again, and what does you rep look like?

[SeekDaGreat]

I'm right here. And I'll lose taking my chances with a proven fighter like Hopkins before I jump on a hype train, 7-days a week. In this case, I was wrong. I go with fighters that have proven something in big fights so MAYBE next time I'll pick Kovalev to win, depending on who he is fighting.

[mlac]

oh dear, i really must post much more, so simpletons like yourself will respect me :smileysex

you really are more than a bit dim