Heavyweight Top 10
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Haye has been inactive for over 2 years and has no fight scheduled so I see to reason to rank him in the top 10.1-10 HW rankings current... Anybody have different list..
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. David Haye (if he's still alive)
3. Bermane Stiverne
4. Chris Arreola
5. Alexander Povetkin
6. Kubrat Pulev
7. Deontay Wilder
8. Tyson Fury
9. Bryant Jennings
10. Dereck Chisora
Any comparisons?
#6 is too low for Pulev. He should be higher than Arreola (whose only arguably decent win is Mitchell) and Stiverne (whose only good win is Arreola).
#4 is way too high for Arreola. What is he even doing in the top 10?
Pov should be #2. Funnily enough, he seems to be taking his career much more seriously since the Wlad loss. Charr and (especially) Takam are two very decent wins by today's HW standards.
Fury should be higher, too. I hate his guts but he has the wins to be better than #8.
My top 10 would be something like:
1) Wlad
2) Povetkin
3) Pulev
4) Fury
5) Stiverne
6) Jennings
7) Chisora
8) Wilder
9) Glazkov
10) idk Takam/Perez/Chagaev/Adamek/ThompsonComment
-
Fury? .....Regarding Stiverne vs Povetkin I also think Povetkin is way more proven against top level competition and also is really the only contender fighting top 10 calibur opposition consistently, and therefore I still see him as #1 contender. But I have a guy in mind that I think would beat him.Comment
-
Comment
-
Haye shouldn't be anywhere near that list...why is Arreola above Fury and Povetkin AND Pulev? On what basis?1-10 HW rankings current... Anybody have different list..
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. David Haye (if he's still alive)
3. Bermane Stiverne
4. Chris Arreola
5. Alexander Povetkin
6. Kubrat Pulev
7. Deontay Wilder
8. Tyson Fury
9. Bryant Jennings
10. Dereck Chisora
Any comparisons?
For me it'd be:
1. Wlad
2. Povetkin
3. Stiverne
4. Pulev
5. Fury
6. Jennings
7. Perez (is so up and down but tonnes of talent and skill)
8. Chisora
9. Wilder
10. Glazkov (possibly...could probably insert Arreola, just goes to show you a lack of real depth to the division as a whole)Comment
Comment