"Eras" are irrelevant. There are guys in each era who would beat guys from other eras (while acknowledging the general improvement in conditioning and nutrition over time).
Which one you consider the best is highly subjective. Are you asking which one had the top 3 fighters even if below them was an empty abyss? Or which one had the best 20 fighters even if none of them were truly exceptional? etc.
When I say Lennox Lewis or Vitali Klitschko could beat all of the '70s heavyweights I specifically mean them. People tend to have a kneejerk reaction and respond with stuff like "so you think Mormeck would beat Foreman?!?!?" No, Foreman would have walked through that bum too.
Likewise when I point out that Tyson lorded over a very crappy roster in the '80s -- I'm not saying Tyson himself wasn't good, just stating the truth.
Blind worship of any "era" (consisting of thousands of fighters) is very silly.
Which one you consider the best is highly subjective. Are you asking which one had the top 3 fighters even if below them was an empty abyss? Or which one had the best 20 fighters even if none of them were truly exceptional? etc.
When I say Lennox Lewis or Vitali Klitschko could beat all of the '70s heavyweights I specifically mean them. People tend to have a kneejerk reaction and respond with stuff like "so you think Mormeck would beat Foreman?!?!?" No, Foreman would have walked through that bum too.
Likewise when I point out that Tyson lorded over a very crappy roster in the '80s -- I'm not saying Tyson himself wasn't good, just stating the truth.
Blind worship of any "era" (consisting of thousands of fighters) is very silly.

Comment