In a fit of salty-ness, Espinoza drops Canelo's real PPV numbers
Collapse
-
-
I don't see it. B now your connecting the dots with DiBella said it was less, Espinoza gave a made up number and your running with it as fact. It was 375k and wasn't a huge success but they made money.Comment
-
-
-
You clearly saw it since you responded to the post. But you back and check it agian, Dibella states it sold much less than 350 and didn't say anything so he wouldn't contradict Arum.Comment
-
It's not really that hard for Espinoza to come back strong. All he needs is make Haymon fighters fight each other. He could form the Thurman vs Alexander card next. Then Broner vs Matthysse, then Khan vs Guerrero, etc, whichever comes first.Comment
-
Is this some old thread? I assumed you meant in this one, and I scrolled past it. I don't even know what I'm arguing... You can stick with your Canelo numbers which were reported and I'll stick with the Cotto numbers that were reported. I'm not sure what else you're trying to prove, other than "believe Dibella and not Arum."Comment
-
Is this some old thread? I assumed you meant in this one, and I scrolled past it. I don't even know what I'm arguing... You can stick with your Canelo numbers which were reported and I'll stick with the Cotto numbers that were reported. I'm not sure what else you're trying to prove, other than "believe Dibella and not Arum."
I'm proving Dibella, someone who directly profited from the Cotto/Martinez fight admitted it sold much less than 350.Comment
-
No wonder I didn't find it, because it says nothing about doing less. It says 350 was not the real number, and 375k was reported so again that's what I'm going with.Comment
-
Comment
Comment