Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
In a fit of salty-ness, Espinoza drops Canelo's real PPV numbers
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
He didn't dispute it being Canelo's numbers, it was deleted because of the tag not that the numbers were wrong, or not even Canelo's.
September 23, 2014
Industry sources say Alvarez generated 360,000 pay-per-view buys earlier this year against Alfredo Angulo, and around 325,000 buys vs. Erislandy Lara in July, a bout that competed against the World Cup.
“We’re proud of the work we did with ‘Canelo’ in establishing him as pay-per-view star,” Espinoza said. “I’ve heard Cotto’s fight with [Sergio] Martinez did 230,000 buys on HBO. If he thinks that’s a better route … ”
Edit:Originally posted by mrpain81 View PostLast edited by Dinamita 03; 09-26-2014, 12:37 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dinamita 03 View PostCan't really be any clearer than this...
September 23, 2014
Industry sources say Alvarez generated 360,000 pay-per-view buys earlier this year against Alfredo Angulo, and around 325,000 buys vs. Erislandy Lara in July, a bout that competed against the World Cup.
“We’re proud of the work we did with ‘Canelo’ in establishing him as pay-per-view star,” Espinoza said. “I’ve heard Cotto’s fight with [Sergio] Martinez did 230,000 buys on HBO. If he thinks that’s a better route … ”
Edit:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostAnd then Espinoza, the actual head of Showtime Boxing, not a press outlet is saying the number is 250k. Do you not understand they LIE about their numbers? The guy says it right here, this morning and you bring up old articles to defend a lie. Go figure he only released the number and didn't deny it when Canelo leaves the network. Be happy no one watched the Lara fight instead of mad about it, that would have lost fans not gained any.
You guys are all so ****ing ******.
He's comparing Cotto's #'s 230k and Canelos numbers 325k, because they are being set up to fight in May against May.
Get it?
I don't care for Espinoza. Guy probably isn't intellectual or qualified to be leading Showtime boxing, but all you ***ing ******s that buzz around this site eating up every lie on twitter you hear ****ing sicken me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da Machine View PostNo he's not you idiot....
You guys are all so ****ing ******.
He's comparing Cotto's #'s 230k and Canelos numbers 325k, because they are being set up to fight in May against May.
Get it?
I don't care for Espinoza. Guy probably isn't intellectual or qualified to be leading Showtime boxing, but all you ***ing ******s that buzz around this site eating up every lie on twitter you hear ****ing sicken me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da Machine View PostNo he's not you idiot....
You guys are all so ****ing ******.
He's comparing Cotto's #'s 230k and Canelos numbers 325k, because they are being set up to fight in May against May.
Get it?
I don't care for Espinoza. Guy probably isn't intellectual or qualified to be leading Showtime boxing, but all you ***ing ******s that buzz around this site eating up every lie on twitter you hear ****ing sicken me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostAnd then Espinoza, the actual head of Showtime Boxing, not a press outlet is saying the number is 250k. Do you not understand they LIE about their numbers? The guy says it right here, this morning and you bring up old articles to defend a lie. Go figure he only released the number and didn't deny it when Canelo leaves the network. Be happy no one watched the Lara fight instead of mad about it, that would have lost fans not gained any.
By the way I'm furious the Lara fight didn't sell, I didn't get my cut due to the low numbers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dinamita 03 View PostI don't understand how your not getting this. He mentions three numbers in that articles, from 3 days ago by the way, and the numbers from his tweet match the Canelo/Lara fight and the Cotto/Martinez fight. It can't be any clearer.
By the way I'm furious the Lara fight didn't sell, I didn't get my cut due to the low numbers
Comment
Comment