Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No style has an advantage over Joe Calzaghe's style

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by OASIS_LAD
    i never said that but yes u have to agree his power is underrated
    and was by lacy who called him a slapper

    ok ok ok. slaps with alittle power on them. but there still slaps

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by baya
      i was just thinking about the serious ownage that calzaghe handed down to lacy. like WTF just happened here.

      i bet lacy can't bear to hear the name joe. mark my words, he'll never go for a rematch - i've never seen anyone owned like that in my life.

      kinda takes the sting off the whole hopkins/tito match
      Every great fighter doesn't allow a loss to go unavenged. But then lacy is a tomato can and always was. The problem isnt asking for a rematch, its the fact he was shut out 12 rds and doesnt deserve one!

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by SquareCircle
        his style not his stance
        That is a style fool.

        Comment


        • #24
          damnit cheney, i knew I should have put your ass on ignore before making this thread so you wouldnt be able to post in it. all you do is chime in with bull**** comments. one things for sure, from now on, you wont be posting in any of my threads. and that was not a style.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Dick Cheney
            1000 slaps will hurt anyone if they just stand there. Did lacy get KO? No. ****ing welsh slapping ******.

            true. he just stood there. hell a 100lber would hurt me if i really didnt put up a defense and stood in the same spot

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by SquareCircle
              his style not his stance
              Being a defensive southpaw is a style, bud. Defensive southpaws give a lot of guys a lot of trouble, and always have. It's different and poses different problems that being a defensive orhtodox fighter.

              And baya, no, this doesn't take the stong off of Hopkins-Tito. Tito was top 5 p4p.

              Comment


              • #27
                tarver is a classic boxer-puncher with small counterpunch ability. southpaw is a stance.

                'defensive oriented' isnt a style.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Super_Lightweight
                  Being a defensive southpaw is a style, bud. Defensive southpaws give a lot of guys a lot of trouble, and always have. It's different and poses different problems that being a defensive orhtodox fighter.

                  And baya, no, this doesn't take the stong off of Hopkins-Tito. Tito was top 5 p4p.
                  actually, it does - i feel a lot better about it

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Yes it is, period. Anything that describes how a guy fights is his style. A stance is part of a style. Whoever got you thinking that stance is not part of style was not thinking clearly.

                    And Cheney...shut up.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by SquareCircle
                      damnit cheney, i knew I should have put your ass on ignore before making this thread so you wouldnt be able to post in it. all you do is chime in with bull**** comments. one things for sure, from now on, you wont be posting in any of my threads. and that was not a style.

                      Awww. Does that mean I'm off your buddy list? BWAHAHAHA!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP