Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Common myths in boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Marvellous1 View Post
    Because he suffered two stoppage defeats, Lennox Lewis had a weak chin.

    Lewis got big shots from plenty of heavyweights without going down (Vitali and Briggs landed big on him and he fought though it, for example).


    lewis fought tons of punchers. his chin is criminally underrated.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Jsmooth9876 View Post
      Yeah cause nobody has ever landed a desperation haymaker...I'm the idiot...ok, stay red my friend....
      I'll say it again, there's no such thing as a lucky punch in boxing. I could throw a hundred hay-makers in a round, that's my choice... it's the opponent who has to nullify anything that I do. Pacquiao did not. It was not a lucky punch.

      Comment


      • #63
        The big myth of Mayweather thinking his TBE

        Running n holding desperately

        Hes good but if u gonna be doing that crap dont call yourself TBE

        Comment


        • #64
          Mayweather's a small welterweight.

          The concept of a lucky punch.

          Comment


          • #65
            Mayweather is physically weak and is easy to outmuscle.

            Pacquiao had improved SOO much after moving to WW.

            Cotto got schooled by Trout

            Mayweather won 10 rounds against Cotto

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Wuckoo View Post
              I completely agree on sweet pea but I'm curious about the mosley thing? Why don't you think he is skilled?
              It is not exactly put the best way, but I don't know how many times through Mosley's career people told me how good a technical boxer he was. It is not like he was a total hack as a technician in the ring better than most in fact but people made him out to be a far better boxer than he ever was.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
                It is not exactly put the best way, but I don't know how many times through Mosley's career people told me how good a technical boxer he was. It is not like he was a total hack as a technician in the ring better than most in fact but people made him out to be a far better boxer than he ever was.
                Ah right I see what you mean. Tbh I always thought mosley relied too much on power and speed, which slowed down as he got older

                Comment


                • #68
                  myth: floyd isn't a coward and fraud

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    myth: floyd´s roadblocks

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Wuckoo View Post
                      Ah right I see what you mean. Tbh I always thought mosley relied too much on power and speed, which slowed down as he got older


                      mosley also had an amazing chin in his prime. he was a very rough go at 135 and 147, but it wasn't because of how skilled he was. he was extremely talented. hard puncher, very fast hands and explosive feet, and a great chin. that's the whole package, in terms of the athletic talent you bring with you to the sport.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP