I think I'm going to watch this for the first time since episode 2.
Having read Jim's comments, I don't see what people are criticising him for. He says Mayweather acting as an apologist for Rice was reprehensible. He's not wrong.
His wider points about Floyd are generally correct also, and are shared by the overwhelming majority of people who know who Floyd is.
Having read Jim's comments, I don't see what people are criticising him for. He says Mayweather acting as an apologist for Rice was reprehensible. He's not wrong.
His wider points about Floyd are generally correct also, and are shared by the overwhelming majority of people who know who Floyd is.
Comment