Is Algieri better than Broner? He beat Taylor more easily

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

ive never seen so many floyd fans refer to triangle theory so much. i wonder if they felt the same way about marquez, pacquiao and floyd...

of course they didnt lmfao

[HeroBando]

Who's better Foreman or Ali?

Ali struggled badly with Norton and Frazier.

Foreman destroyed both in a few rounds.

Yeah but Ali had lots of top wins unlike Broner who doesnt, and struggled many times vs less that top level comp: Quintero, PDL, Paulie, Maidana, Taylor. So at some point its less about styles and more about ability. But even stylewise Algieri seems like a winner h2h

[Gods We Faked]

Actually that is EXACTLY what you said:

*Betting odds do the same thing, very few people regard them as worthless.*

In response to the part of your post that was highlighted. Which was

it *suggests* that one is better than the other based on an outside factor without actually having to prove it by fighting each other.

[2fast2strong]

Why do you have a photo in your avatar of a really ****** guy who can't even read?

I do not think that that has any bearing on this debate, which i find stimulating.

So to keep the integrity of your own thread intact, personal agendas should be put to the side, i would think

[IronDanHamza]

Yeah but Ali had lots of top wins unlike Broner who doesnt, and struggled many times vs less that top level comp: Quintero, PDL, Paulie, Maidana, Taylor. So at some point its less about styles and more about ability. But even stylewise Algieri seems like a winner h2h

I'd pick Algeri to win aswell, but not because he beat Taylor easier.

Ali struggled with Doug Jones and Henry Cooper.

It's irrelevant really the fact is Algeri beating Taylor easier than Broner proves absolutely nothing what so ever.

[HeroBando]

I'd pick Algeri to win aswell, but not because he beat Taylor easier.

Ali struggled with Doug Jones and Henry Cooper.

It's irrelevant really the fact is Algeri beating Taylor easier than Broner proves absolutely nothing what so ever.

True but the pattern of Broner struggling repeatedly with fringers like Taylor does.

[2fast2strong]

In response to the part of your post that was highlighted. Which was

Ok but i was explaining what the Triangle Theory is in that quote, so your response:

*Betting odds do the same thing, very few people regard them as worthless.*

was stating that they base the betting odds on the Triangle Theory, which they do not

[2fast2strong]

ive never seen so many floyd fans refer to triangle theory so much. i wonder if they felt the same way about marquez, pacquiao and floyd...

of course they didnt lmfao

But what is actually more entertaining is your personal agenda, this thread is about Algieri and Broner, not Floyd.

And contrary to what some may believe, Broner and Floyd are not the same person, lol

[Gods We Faked]

Ok but i was explaining what the Triangle Theory is in that quote, so your response:

*Betting odds do the same thing, very few people regard them as worthless.*

was stating that they base the betting odds on the Triangle Theory, which they do not

The purpose of highlighting a particular part of a sentence is to isolate it. The purpose of isolating it was to show that your definition was ambiguous and could also be used to describe betting odds. How about this: That's exactly what betting odds are, they imply that one is better than the other based on outside factors without actually having to prove it by fighting each other.

[hectari]

But what is actually more entertaining is your personal agenda, this thread is about Algieri and Broner, not Floyd.

And contrary to what some may believe, Broner and Floyd are not the same person, lol

What agenda does he have? he just laughed at some Floyd fans being hypocrites saying the triangle theory doesn't work when they are known for using that with Mayweather when the Pacquiao topic comes up, they will say look wht Floyd did to Marquez he out box him but Pac went to war with him and got knocked out, that means Floyd beats Pac easy.

So they must have an Agenda.