Is Algieri better than Broner? He beat Taylor more easily

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ragnar Lothbrok
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 6329
    • 532
    • 573
    • 7,422

    #41
    ive never seen so many floyd fans refer to triangle theory so much. i wonder if they felt the same way about marquez, pacquiao and floyd...

    of course they didnt lmfao

    Comment

    • HeroBando
      I love Mayweather
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2011
      • 17452
      • 236
      • 0
      • 24,430

      #42
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      Who's better Foreman or Ali?

      Ali struggled badly with Norton and Frazier.

      Foreman destroyed both in a few rounds.
      Yeah but Ali had lots of top wins unlike Broner who doesnt, and struggled many times vs less that top level comp: Quintero, PDL, Paulie, Maidana, Taylor. So at some point its less about styles and more about ability. But even stylewise Algieri seems like a winner h2h

      Comment

      • Gods We Faked
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Dec 2013
        • 720
        • 51
        • 27
        • 7,110

        #43
        Originally posted by 2fast2strong
        Actually that is EXACTLY what you said:

        *Betting odds do the same thing, very few people regard them as worthless.*
        In response to the part of your post that was highlighted. Which was
        it *suggests* that one is better than the other based on an outside factor without actually having to prove it by fighting each other.

        Comment

        • 2fast2strong
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2014
          • 1306
          • 317
          • 31
          • 13,329

          #44
          Originally posted by Freedom2014
          Why do you have a photo in your avatar of a really ****** guy who can't even read?
          I do not think that that has any bearing on this debate, which i find stimulating.

          So to keep the integrity of your own thread intact, personal agendas should be put to the side, i would think

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 49485
            • 5,031
            • 270
            • 104,043

            #45
            Originally posted by HeroBando
            Yeah but Ali had lots of top wins unlike Broner who doesnt, and struggled many times vs less that top level comp: Quintero, PDL, Paulie, Maidana, Taylor. So at some point its less about styles and more about ability. But even stylewise Algieri seems like a winner h2h
            I'd pick Algeri to win aswell, but not because he beat Taylor easier.

            Ali struggled with Doug Jones and Henry Cooper.

            It's irrelevant really the fact is Algeri beating Taylor easier than Broner proves absolutely nothing what so ever.

            Comment

            • HeroBando
              I love Mayweather
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2011
              • 17452
              • 236
              • 0
              • 24,430

              #46
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza
              I'd pick Algeri to win aswell, but not because he beat Taylor easier.

              Ali struggled with Doug Jones and Henry Cooper.

              It's irrelevant really the fact is Algeri beating Taylor easier than Broner proves absolutely nothing what so ever.
              True but the pattern of Broner struggling repeatedly with fringers like Taylor does.

              Comment

              • 2fast2strong
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2014
                • 1306
                • 317
                • 31
                • 13,329

                #47
                Originally posted by Kulilin
                In response to the part of your post that was highlighted. Which was
                Ok but i was explaining what the Triangle Theory is in that quote, so your response:

                *Betting odds do the same thing, very few people regard them as worthless.*

                was stating that they base the betting odds on the Triangle Theory, which they do not

                Comment

                • 2fast2strong
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 1306
                  • 317
                  • 31
                  • 13,329

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Ragnar Lothbrok
                  ive never seen so many floyd fans refer to triangle theory so much. i wonder if they felt the same way about marquez, pacquiao and floyd...

                  of course they didnt lmfao
                  But what is actually more entertaining is your personal agenda, this thread is about Algieri and Broner, not Floyd.

                  And contrary to what some may believe, Broner and Floyd are not the same person, lol

                  Comment

                  • Gods We Faked
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Dec 2013
                    • 720
                    • 51
                    • 27
                    • 7,110

                    #49
                    Originally posted by 2fast2strong
                    Ok but i was explaining what the Triangle Theory is in that quote, so your response:

                    *Betting odds do the same thing, very few people regard them as worthless.*

                    was stating that they base the betting odds on the Triangle Theory, which they do not
                    The purpose of highlighting a particular part of a sentence is to isolate it. The purpose of isolating it was to show that your definition was ambiguous and could also be used to describe betting odds. How about this: That's exactly what betting odds are, they imply that one is better than the other based on outside factors without actually having to prove it by fighting each other.
                    Last edited by Gods We Faked; 09-07-2014, 05:45 PM.

                    Comment

                    • hectari
                      Power to the People
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 22896
                      • 1,430
                      • 768
                      • 131,802

                      #50
                      Originally posted by 2fast2strong
                      But what is actually more entertaining is your personal agenda, this thread is about Algieri and Broner, not Floyd.

                      And contrary to what some may believe, Broner and Floyd are not the same person, lol
                      What agenda does he have? he just laughed at some Floyd fans being hypocrites saying the triangle theory doesn't work when they are known for using that with Mayweather when the Pacquiao topic comes up, they will say look wht Floyd did to Marquez he out box him but Pac went to war with him and got knocked out, that means Floyd beats Pac easy.

                      So they must have an Agenda.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP