Adrien Broner is Good For Boxing

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SkillspayBills
    Garlic Butter Gang!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 29181
    • 2,155
    • 3,739
    • 61,188

    #41
    Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
    He might be better on the mic than Floyd, it just sucks for him he's not nearly as good in the ring.
    This here.

    Against elite competition Broner has looked.......human. Floyd is really a once in a generation talent.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #42
      Broner provides a different kind of entertainment.

      Trying to compare him to the Provodnikov-Alvarado Face/Off is a little silly. It's apples and oranges. At the end of the day, as "compelling" as that may have been, no one cares about those two.

      Comment

      • The Gambler1981
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2008
        • 25961
        • 521
        • 774
        • 49,039

        #43
        Broner has the villain role on lock, which is really a great career move because you only need to win every so often against minimal competition if people are willing to see you get beat.

        Really most of the time in sports now a days it is so bland, but in boxing every so often you still get brash ****y guys like Broner and they are good for the sport even if they may not be all that great at the sport. Broner takes it to the next level but in a sport like boxing I don't see a big issue with it.

        Comment

        • Sparked_26
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2012
          • 15648
          • 1,020
          • 135
          • 93,128

          #44
          Some of the stuff he does is a little crass but you do need guys who put themselves out there and with social media most athletes do not want to open themselves up to any kind of widespread condemnation from the mass media.

          I would take a Broner over a weirdo like Shawn Porter or a geeky passive aggressive oddity like Wlad.

          Broner is puerile you know where you are with and some of the stuff he says is funny. If he was respectful to all opponents post fight I would not have any issues with him whatsoever.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #45
            I stand by this after tonight's fight.

            Broner is still very flawed but is exciting to watch both outside and in the ring.

            He got caught clean a few times and always responded like a fighter, coming back even stronger. That knockdown at the end was great.

            He never got the credit he deserved for the heart he showed in the Maidana fight either

            Comment

            • LoadedWraps
              Official NSB POTY 2016
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2010
              • 24267
              • 1,021
              • 1,468
              • 190,165

              #46
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              I stand by this after tonight's fight.

              Broner is still very flawed but is exciting to watch both outside and in the ring.

              He got caught clean a few times and always responded like a fighter, coming back even stronger. That knockdown at the end was great.

              He never got the credit he deserved for the heart he showed in the Maidana fight either
              Fury is good for boxing . Broner is a cancer. One entertaining fight doesn't change that. gtfo

              Comment

              • PAC-BOY
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 55380
                • 4,125
                • 5,352
                • 157,380

                #47
                Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
                you guys are on your own....**** broner
                im with you .

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #48
                  Originally posted by LoadedWraps
                  Fury is good for boxing . Broner is a cancer. One entertaining fight doesn't change that. gtfo
                  Tonight's fight didn't change anything. Just reinforced it. He's always been good for boxing. He made Maidana relevant again so you should be thankful

                  Comment

                  • PAC-BOY
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 55380
                    • 4,125
                    • 5,352
                    • 157,380

                    #49
                    Broner is good for nothing.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #50
                      Originally posted by PAC-BOY
                      Broner is good for nothing.
                      He generates interest whether it's positive or, in your case - negative.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP