Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cotto vs Lara

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Cotto vs. Rod Salka's bigger brother Tod Salka at a 157 CW.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by BendOver View Post
      that D fighter can punch, if you get caught by a perros punch you are either going down or start dancing, you seems to avoid the obvoius and that's why did he got caught? First the ring was smallest than a phone booth, the mat was filled with foam, he had a 10 pounds rehydration clause while perro never got the memo, put all together and that's your recipe for disaster and the two rounds perro won, beating poor Lara is a bit of a strecht...
      LOL man bro you always gotta pull out the excuse book.

      "lara had a tooth infection doe, He was tired, The ring was small"

      how in da fck was that ring small? and lara doesnt rehydrate more than 10 pounds I thought anyways, so whats the big deal???

      Lara just isnt that good man, as bad as you want him to be on rigo's level he never will be and never was. Lara is hype

      Molina would beat him AGAIN and vanes would probably beat him too

      Comment


      • #83
        Lara's reach is 75in while Cotto's is 67in. If Lara boxes Cotto from the outside like Trout did and stays away from trading with him, he has a good chance of beating him.

        Comment


        • #84
          Cotto has more layers to his game then Lara ever will. Cotto beats the master boxer by a clear decision.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by robust_ View Post
            Cotto vs. Rod Salka's bigger brother Tod Salka at a 157 CW.
            That seems likely, we all know those Puerto Rican pussboys don't want to fight the main threat of the division

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
              That seems likely, we all know those Puerto Rican pussboys don't want to fight the main threat of the division
              Just like your boy Stevenson, you really shouldn't comment.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
                Just like your boy Stevenson, you really shouldn't comment.
                Hopkins ducked the number one to fight trashy flat footed Kovalev.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Bardock View Post
                  LOL man bro you always gotta pull out the excuse book.

                  "lara had a tooth infection doe, He was tired, The ring was small"

                  how in da fck was that ring small? and lara doesnt rehydrate more than 10 pounds I thought anyways, so whats the big deal???

                  Lara just isnt that good man, as bad as you want him to be on rigo's level he never will be and never was. Lara is hype

                  Molina would beat him AGAIN and vanes would probably beat him too
                  boy there not excuses it is what it is, if lara is that bad then canelo is a piece of $h1t, it was well documented that it was a small ring and a slow mat, everyone know they didn't let lara go over 10 pounds, even if he doesn't go over naturally they put pressure on the fighter while his adversary doesn't have to worry, mind games are a big deal in any sport and life, you probably were not a fan when he fought molina but, the fight was on and off because the couldn't find anyone until molina step up, by then shields was with Rigondeaux in Ireland and the fight was almost cancel again because laras illness, now if you want to believe that red ridding hood is an atg just be happy with that thought, putting down other fighters doesn't make your idol great, I know you had read my post regarding lara-ginger so **** off...

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
                    Logically Cotto would lose to Lara. Trout had no problem beating Cotto and Lara is a slick southpaw similar to Trout only better with more speed and power. Canelo deserves lots of credit for edging Lara out in a close fight. Canelo is probably the only 154 pounder who can beat Lara. Lara is not someone who Cotto would fight anyway because he is very high risk and low reward money wise.
                    So by this rationale, the Cotto that we're talking about facing Lara is the one from the Trout fight?

                    Have you seen nothing since then that improves your opinion of current Cotto?

                    If you answer "no", I see the logic of your position though I may disagree.

                    After that fight I thought he'd hang em' up. I thought he looked like he didn't train hard for that fight and that he was done. To give credit where it's due, Cotto seems to have benefitted from his association with Roach.

                    In addition, the Trout that beat Cotto is looking like a peak Trout about now.

                    And I think El Perro and Canelo put some hard miles on Lara as well.

                    I'll take current Cotto over current Trout and Lara, though I admit some possible wishful thinking in my figurings.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                      Hopkins ducked the number one to fight trashy flat footed Kovalev.
                      And Stevenson ducked Kovalev before Hopkins lol.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP