Props to Joe, but keep it real

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AREALFIGHTER
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 1532
    • 44
    • 32
    • 7,994

    #21
    Originally posted by Xanxicar
    Calzaghe is 33 not 34 and he just turned 33 coupla weeks ago.

    regards
    your a tool and must of had your head up your gay lover ass joe is 3 weeks away from his 34 birth day or were **** it pay attention when people are talking dumb ass

    Comment

    • RiverCityMike
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2005
      • 297
      • 19
      • 1
      • 6,544

      #22
      Originally posted by RunWithKnives
      Right,

      I ate my ****ing words. A proverbial shoe in my mouth.
      I respect that, man. I wasn't just arguing with you then to argue, but to make my point. It's a lot of cred to you to take it that way. I mean that really. There are a lot of clowns on here but you obviously aren't one of them.

      Comment

      • AREALFIGHTER
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2005
        • 1532
        • 44
        • 32
        • 7,994

        #23
        Originally posted by Bozo_no no
        I didn't make a pick on Peter vs Wlad, and while I thought Lacy would win here tonight, I still think Calzaghe deserves a lot of down grading in the big picture.

        33 years old and it's really one of the 1st times he's stepped up, and it took someone coming to his backyard to do so.

        He's got a ways to go before he earns some of the respect that's being thrown around so freely.
        the byron fight was considered a step up in comp for joe and who was byron a nobody in the big picture

        Comment

        • WindUpMerchant
          Boozo's obsessive over me
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 379
          • 19
          • 8
          • 6,618

          #24
          What's the difference between having 20 defences against IBF stiffs and 18 defences against WBO stiffs?

          Answer: Nothing.

          Comment

          • MetalVomit
            I love *****, Amigo.
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Sep 2004
            • 12193
            • 817
            • 1,204
            • 22,041

            #25
            serious props to JC, serious props. I lost a billion points

            Comment

            • Bozo_no no
              Palabras de Piedra
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 8906
              • 416
              • 496
              • 16,069

              #26
              Originally posted by WindUpMerchant
              What's the difference between having 20 defences against IBF stiffs and 18 defences against WBO stiffs?

              Answer: Nothing.

              Keyword: Stiffs.

              Thank you.

              The differnce is the WBO has far worse and undeserving fighters ranked highly for no reason.

              But you hit the nail on the head. Stiff was the keyword.

              Comment

              • WindUpMerchant
                Boozo's obsessive over me
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 379
                • 19
                • 8
                • 6,618

                #27
                There's no difference bozo.

                Comment

                • Bozo_no no
                  Palabras de Piedra
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 8906
                  • 416
                  • 496
                  • 16,069

                  #28
                  Originally posted by WindUpMerchant
                  There's no difference bozo.

                  There's no difference in the WBO's rankings and the IBF?

                  Don't be naive.

                  And again, it's really beside the point, because we both agreed they were stiffs no matter which way you look at it.

                  Comment

                  • WindUpMerchant
                    Boozo's obsessive over me
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 379
                    • 19
                    • 8
                    • 6,618

                    #29
                    There's not much difference between any of the major 4 belts anyways. It's just a matter of perspective and how you look at it.

                    The fight today proved how bad the current crop of fighters we have today truly are. In no way, shape or form do these guys even compare to the oldies. No fcking way.

                    Comment

                    • Mech.
                      Immortal Iron Fist
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2004
                      • 6015
                      • 485
                      • 992
                      • 13,151

                      #30
                      Originally posted by RunWithKnives
                      Oh and on a side note.

                      I thought Lacy was god. After watching the fight tonight....I think Calzaghe is god.

                      As pathetic and naive as that sounds, I've never been more impressed by a single victory. Ever.
                      You sir, are weak minded.


                      I agree with you 100% Bozo,I didnt want to post this because I didnt want to get flamed or look like I was making excuses since my money was on Lacy.

                      But its like this,Joe's best all time win came against a green fighter,at least Hatton's was against Tszyu.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP