Juan Manuel Marquez = Modern day Buster Douglas

[Strategic1]

The 3rd fight was no robbery. Just deceiving because there was over 10 000 loud Mexicans at the MGM. . Of course they showed displeasure with the result because they are supporting JMM. But any non bias viewer could see the fight going either way as it was extremely close,

[Resilient]

you've seen the proof dozens of times. I'm surely not going to waste time getting it again only for you to pretend it doesn't exist like you are now.

Get over it. Manny got KTFO. Had he been man enough to take $40 mil, no ppv or fight cotto at a full 154 he would have either gotten "pot shotted to death" or got another win.

Instead he fought the smallest guy of the 3, a guy of whom he said he "had no more to prove" and then refused to take PED tests when JMM agreed and suggested they both take it.

Again, its way past. get over it and move on.

Oh, so no proof then, ok.

And LOL @ Cotto at 154... would have made no difference.

[Luilun]

Overrated fighter, got hyped for losing 2 and drawing one (should have lost all 3, got a gift in the first fight) and obv KTFO 6...

But other than Pacquiao it's clear that he's an overhyped fighter...

Went life and death with bums like Katsidis.... lost to Chris John, barely beat a past it Barrera (and ducked the rematch)

Good counterpuncher, good power, good combination puncher.. just not great.

Lets see Marquez 4 titles from 126 to 140 should have won 147 cause the belt was stolen from Pacquaio. Buster Douglas a one hit wonder. My conclusion is your a very ****** person

[Aztekkas]

Point is Marquez can't deal with a variety of styles like true greats can..

He can't deal with fighters who make him lead... he trains and obsessed over Pacquiao because that was one great fighter who he had a good style for.

One hit wonder if you ask me. Plus the whole saga was exaggerated by Pac haters, reality is none of those fights were 'robberies' they were close competitive fights that could have gone either way, plus Pac was clearly robbed by the judges in the first fight.

Contradiction within the same sentence.

Credibility: 0

[Resilient]

Contradiction within the same sentence.

Credibility: 0

No contradiction whatsoever, it's a fact one of the judges incorrectly scored the first round. Had the judge scored it right Manny would have been declared the rightful winner.

[Beercules]

I can't believe someone mentioned a badly faded Casamayor as a good win for JMM

[mezoomozaa]

I agree with you, but I believe he clearly lost to Barrera. It was a robbery.
Moreover, Douglas win over Tyson is much bigger and more shocking than Marquez K.O in his 4th try in a fight he was already losing!

[Cracaphat]

Some people start threads so dumb and ignorant that you can only wish their parents had never met.And this is a classic case in point.

[John Locke]

Getting knocked out by a shelf has obviously done permanent damage to you, OP.

[Dinamita 03]

I can't believe someone mentioned a badly faded Casamayor as a good win for JMM

Both were past their prime and Casamayor was the ring champ at the time, not to mention Marquez was moving up in weight.