Be Totally Honest With Yourself: Who Wins - PAC vs Khan

[LacedUp]

i think even this version of PAC still puts a beating on Khan...Khan can be easily baited into a war and that's where his chin fails him


either that or Khan just clinches the **** out of PAC for 12 boring rounds

I don't know. Roach said Khan dropped Pacman in sparring multiple times, but Pac never dropped Khan.

Of course, I'm not saying it's unlikely that Pac puts a beating on him - but even against the likes of Bradley, Rios and other recent fighters who are good, but who I don't think are special - Pacquiao still doesn't look fantastic or even menacing. He looked pretty good in Bradley 2 to be fair, but he doesn't hurt his opponents anymore. I mean, compare that to the monster who just walked through Cotto as if it was nothing.

I think Khan is significantly bigger than Pacquiao, especially at 147.

When I think about Khan fighting the likes of Porter or Thurman or Maidana even, I think it's fights Khan should stay away from. But Pacquiao is a fight I think is realistically winnable for Khan. And I think that's why they didn't fight Khan.

[Lullaby]

Khan by decision, just cause No one can outbox Khan and I don't think Manny would be able to KO Khan.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

I don't know. Roach said Khan dropped Pacman in sparring multiple times, but Pac never dropped Khan.

Of course, I'm not saying it's unlikely that Pac puts a beating on him - but even against the likes of Bradley, Rios and other recent fighters who are good, but who I don't think are special - Pacquiao still doesn't look fantastic or even menacing. He looked pretty good in Bradley 2 to be fair, but he doesn't hurt his opponents anymore. I mean, compare that to the monster who just walked through Cotto as if it was nothing.

I think Khan is significantly bigger than Pacquiao, especially at 147.

When I think about Khan fighting the likes of Porter or Thurman or Maidana even, I think it's fights Khan should stay away from. But Pacquiao is a fight I think is realistically winnable for Khan. And I think that's why they didn't fight Khan.

nah...more likely its because Al Haymon asked them for something ******ed like $10mil or something

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Manny would outpoint khan... probably drop or hurt him a few times...

Khan isnt the counter puncher needed to beat manny

[Evol]

pac would win but it wont be a walk in the park.. thats my honest opinion and im giving khan some credit here. theres a reason why roach choose to stay with manny over khan when khan was trying to call the shot and tell roach to pick between them.

[Derranged]

Pac isn't the beast he once was but no way could Khan hold him off for 12 rounds. Pac by TKO.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Khan doesn't beat Pacquiao, people continue to make the same mistake of looking at his physical attributes but ignoring all the flaws that comes with it. Algieri doesn't give you much to counter off of, doesn't get into shootouts, he circles his opponents as oppose to moving in straight lines, that coupled with having a considerably better chin I can't possibly see how Khan is a better opponent than Algieri.

I'd go with Pacquiao by decision, I see Khan getting hurt multiple times throughout, possibly dropped but surviving in the end.

[pimpgoz]

Ohh the ******ation of some posters comes out in threads like these. The only way Kahn wins is if Pacquaio is 100% a shot fighter. At this point its not even close.

[FlatLine]

It's a 50-50 fight, either guy could win but I think Khan takes it in a close 115-113 fight split decision type thing.

[Lullaby]

pac would win but it wont be a walk in the park.. thats my honest opinion and im giving khan some credit here. theres a reason why roach choose to stay with manny over khan when khan was trying to call the shot and tell roach to pick between them.

Khan never told Roach to choose b/w him and Manny.