Comments Thread For: Roach: Cotto-Golovkin Would Have Be Closer To 154
Collapse
-
-
hahahhahahahah "YEA 18 STRAIGHT KOS BUT AGAINST WHO!? AGAINST WHO!?" hells yea he let those GGG fans know it. lolWow even I didn't know that.... I don't like catch weights but I don't have a problem with cotto fighting GGG @ 54... He don't need that belt at 60 anyways... GGG a fraud... Teddy atlas went bonkers on him last night saying he hasn't beat anybody
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCcQUlW7ByUComment
-
Comment
-
I just remember why I dislike this guy, Freddie. The guy single handily resurreect the catch-weight fights. Roach, Cotto just fought Martinez at 160...why? I may now have to rescind my praises of Cotto's victory over Martinez, because you knew he was damage goods. I remember this was the same argument you used to keep Pac away from Floyd until it the whole Pac vs Floyd turned into one big soap opera.
Maybe Cotto really need to go back to 154.
Side note: I still can't respect Floyd's victory over Canelo.Last edited by megas30; 08-02-2014, 09:15 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Good grief. Do you actually sit back and read the ******ed **** that you post. Just to give you a clue, GGG and Ward are NOT in the same weight division. GGG and Cotto ARE in the same weight division. Your argument makes no goddamn sense at all. You blindly defend Cotto for wanting to be the middleweight champion by forcing other middleweights to fight below their weight. You, sir, are the definition of a fanboy nuthugger.Nope did not say I supported the catchweights. I said that it has been done before plenty of times but all of a sudden cuz its GGG the ATG , the next GOAT its a freakin problem. But then when ward wants to fight ggg ya say "hes not in the same division doe." "the fight doesnt make financial sense doe." hypocrites.Comment
-
Comment