Cotto's Lawyer: Rubio's mandatory fight was only valid if Martinez won
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah I understand that but how does that concern us as fans. Who gives a **** how much they make. I just find it hypocritical to say what you said about Rubio(rightfully so by the way) and then say this.Comment
-
You seriously asking me that?
You said Rubio is the only MW entitled to fight Cotto followed by saying GGG should of upped his viewership. Ummm WTF has Rubio done to get high ratings? Where are they?
Every truly top elite MW is entitled to fight Cotto. Cotto has only had ONE fight in the division. I know he has to develop his body and all into the division but seriously don't act like his shit don't stink. Dude didn't even do 350k in his last fight so don't act like he's some grand star like others. According to some articles it UNDERPERFORMED.Comment
-
Ward is not in the same division though. Rubio makes financial sense?
You Cotto fans have turned into what you criticized for many years during Cotto's prime years. The Floyd Mayweather fan.Comment
-
was afraid of this...
Steve Kim @steveucnlive · 49m
A name being mentioned for Cotto on that date is Andy Lee for Dec 13 #BoxingComment
-
i don't understand why some are so quick to jump on the duckwagon. no rubio means there's a better chance at him fighting ggg. if he doesn't fight ggg (who is the only one worthy at that weight) he'll deserve getting **** on by everyone. till then, relax.Comment
-
Comment


Comment