Agree with Catrin. The MW belt was for legacy. Canelo is the money fight for Cotto at 54. Then maybe Floyd rematch but only at 54 also (and therefore unlikely). GGG brings nothing to the table comparatively at this point except guaranteed pain.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Trainer: Cotto Should Face 160-Pounder or Drop
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ChampBox@PR View PostTrue Story!! Lets see GGG huggers try and justify that quote!
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Postso its GGG's fault that Cotto is holding the lineal and WBC middleweight titles hostage even though you claim he's not a middleweight? Somehow that's on GGG?
smh.......
Cesar Bazan
Carlos Maussa
Randall Bailey
DeMarcus Corley
Ricardo Torres
Paul Malignaggi
Carlos Quintana
Zab Judah
Shane Mosley
Antonio Margarito
Joshua Clottey
Manny Pacquiao
Ricardo Mayorga
Floyd Mayweather Jr
Austin Trout
Sergio Gabriel Martinez
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Postso its GGG's fault that Cotto is holding the lineal and WBC middleweight titles hostage even though you claim he's not a middleweight? Somehow that's on GGG?
smh.......
Let me explain something to your dumbass:
1. If Cotto vacates the WBC belt Rubio is the mandatory and Murray is the next in line, so they will fight for that title. So GGG wont get a shot a that title, nor he will pursue a fight with neither of those 2 because they don't bring $$$ and that's the only reason he wants Cotto.
2. For the 1000 Gazzillion time Cotto cant drop or quit being the lineal Champ unless he goes back in time and loses to Martinez.
3. By GGG's standards he wont fight Ward because Ward brings no $$$/ Wel;l for Cotto GGG dont bring $$$, so there is that.
in other words GGG is begging for a Cotto fight first because its a money fight and second its the only way he can fight for a title and make $$$. Cotto dont need GGG because A Cotto doesnt win anything at all by beating him, I mean Cotto is already the lineal champ, and second Cotto wins his money fighting whoever.!
Comment
Comment