It's funny considering what Arum said about Maidana.... but this line will drop a lot lower way before the fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao opens up as a 14-1 favorite
Collapse
-
Originally posted by johnm is... View PostThat's not how odds work, my guy. Floyd was a 14/1 favorite. Which makes Maidana about a 7/1 underdog. You won't ever see odds like -1400/+1400.
The same article said that you "could find Maidana as high as +1000". Which means 10/1.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnm is... View PostNo, it's not technically correct to say that. It's making something up, to say that. Maidana wasn't an 18/1 underdog. Period. The only way it's correct to say he's an 18/1 underdog, is if you can bet on him at 18/1. I mean, that's why these odds exist. Imagine telling someone that Maidana is an 18/1 dog, then they try to bet it, and get 7/1. They'll think you're a moron that doesn't know what he's saying.
And when we're talking about -1800 favorites, there's no reason in the world to juice it any higher than it needs to be. No one is laying $1800 to win $100.
the true odds would be 9.5 to 1, gotta split the juice to get "true ******** odds"
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnm is... View PostNo, it's not technically correct to say that. It's making something up, to say that. Maidana wasn't an 18/1 underdog. Period. The only way it's correct to say he's an 18/1 underdog, is if you can bet on him at 18/1. I mean, that's why these odds exist. Imagine telling someone that Maidana is an 18/1 dog, then they try to bet it, and get 7/1. They'll think you're a moron that doesn't know what he's saying.
And when we're talking about -1800 favorites, there's no reason in the world to juice it any higher than it needs to be. No one is laying $1800 to win $100.
I know you've seen that pic I had
That means that according to that oddsmaker, If Floyd and Maidana fought 19 times, Floyd would win 18 of them. Thats what it means to be a 18-1 underdog
Imagine it was the other way around and Maidana was a +700 to win. Would you tell people that Floyd was only a -700?
No, because your supposed to go by the odds placed on the favorite
And experienced betters know that boxing odds aren't 1:1. You always have to pay more juice when picking a favorite. If they don't know that than they are the idiots
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnm is... View PostThat's not how odds work, my guy. Floyd was a 14/1 favorite. Which makes Maidana about a 7/1 underdog. You won't ever see odds like -1400/+1400.
The same article said that you "could find Maidana as high as +1000". Which means 10/1.
Jenna J: Odds makers have you as wide as a 14-1 underdog.
respected boxing journalist jenna j confirmed it.
sportsbook.com had maidana as 14-1 underdog.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Check_hooks View PostAre you denying that you could've bet Floyd at -1800?
I know you've seen that pic I had
That means that according to that oddsmaker, If Floyd and Maidana fought 19 times, Floyd would win 18 of them. Thats what it means to be a 18-1 underdog
Imagine it was the other way around and Maidana was a +700 to win. Would you tell people that Floyd was only a -700?
No, because your supposed to go by the odds placed on the favorite
And experienced betters know that boxing odds aren't 1:1. You always have to pay more juice when picking a favorite. If they don't know that than they are the idiots
Comment
-
Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post*goes to Vegas and puts $5 on PAC*
Chris can win this.
And we all know Pac is not safe for a decision, after Bradley won the first fight so its anyones game.
this isnt Mayweather Maidana where nobody can win a decision over Floyd.
Comment
-
Comment