Pacquiao opens up as a 14-1 favorite

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hougigo
    Gossip Girl
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 38755
    • 730
    • 236
    • 47,223

    #31
    It's funny considering what Arum said about Maidana.... but this line will drop a lot lower way before the fight.

    Comment

    • HanzGruber
      STRAPMEUP
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2011
      • 29824
      • 1,069
      • 238
      • 81,632

      #32
      Originally posted by johnm is...
      That's not how odds work, my guy. Floyd was a 14/1 favorite. Which makes Maidana about a 7/1 underdog. You won't ever see odds like -1400/+1400.

      The same article said that you "could find Maidana as high as +1000". Which means 10/1.
      Lol tell these noobs. People just hear arum say 18-1 then run with it

      Comment

      • kurupt1019
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 60
        • 6
        • 18
        • 7,498

        #33
        Originally posted by johnm is...
        No, it's not technically correct to say that. It's making something up, to say that. Maidana wasn't an 18/1 underdog. Period. The only way it's correct to say he's an 18/1 underdog, is if you can bet on him at 18/1. I mean, that's why these odds exist. Imagine telling someone that Maidana is an 18/1 dog, then they try to bet it, and get 7/1. They'll think you're a moron that doesn't know what he's saying.

        And when we're talking about -1800 favorites, there's no reason in the world to juice it any higher than it needs to be. No one is laying $1800 to win $100.
        you gotta split the difference, so if floyd was -1200 and maidana was +700,

        the true odds would be 9.5 to 1, gotta split the juice to get "true ******** odds"

        Comment

        • hhs661
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 6467
          • 409
          • 417
          • 20,927

          #34
          14-1? That it?

          Comment

          • Check_hooks
            The Don of NSB
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 12099
            • 966
            • 1,875
            • 25,959

            #35
            Originally posted by johnm is...
            No, it's not technically correct to say that. It's making something up, to say that. Maidana wasn't an 18/1 underdog. Period. The only way it's correct to say he's an 18/1 underdog, is if you can bet on him at 18/1. I mean, that's why these odds exist. Imagine telling someone that Maidana is an 18/1 dog, then they try to bet it, and get 7/1. They'll think you're a moron that doesn't know what he's saying.

            And when we're talking about -1800 favorites, there's no reason in the world to juice it any higher than it needs to be. No one is laying $1800 to win $100.
            Are you denying that you could've bet Floyd at -1800?

            I know you've seen that pic I had

            That means that according to that oddsmaker, If Floyd and Maidana fought 19 times, Floyd would win 18 of them. Thats what it means to be a 18-1 underdog

            Imagine it was the other way around and Maidana was a +700 to win. Would you tell people that Floyd was only a -700?

            No, because your supposed to go by the odds placed on the favorite

            And experienced betters know that boxing odds aren't 1:1. You always have to pay more juice when picking a favorite. If they don't know that than they are the idiots

            Comment

            • Divine Hammer
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 7661
              • 376
              • 4
              • 37,824

              #36
              Originally posted by johnm is...
              That's not how odds work, my guy. Floyd was a 14/1 favorite. Which makes Maidana about a 7/1 underdog. You won't ever see odds like -1400/+1400.

              The same article said that you "could find Maidana as high as +1000". Which means 10/1.
              http://**********boxing.com/marcos-m...-in-the-world/

              Jenna J: Odds makers have you as wide as a 14-1 underdog.

              respected boxing journalist jenna j confirmed it.

              sportsbook.com had maidana as 14-1 underdog.

              Comment

              • johnm is...
                ****in *** Broads
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 10700
                • 820
                • 1,382
                • 48,813

                #37
                Originally posted by Check_hooks
                Are you denying that you could've bet Floyd at -1800?

                I know you've seen that pic I had

                That means that according to that oddsmaker, If Floyd and Maidana fought 19 times, Floyd would win 18 of them. Thats what it means to be a 18-1 underdog

                Imagine it was the other way around and Maidana was a +700 to win. Would you tell people that Floyd was only a -700?

                No, because your supposed to go by the odds placed on the favorite

                And experienced betters know that boxing odds aren't 1:1. You always have to pay more juice when picking a favorite. If they don't know that than they are the idiots
                That's exactly what I'm saying. If Maidana is a 7/1 underdog, it doesn't mean Floyd is a 1/7 favorite. If you can't bet on Maidana at 18/1, then Maidana is NOT 18/1. That's all there is to it, man.

                Comment

                • Ringlife
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 5861
                  • 64
                  • 49
                  • 12,524

                  #38
                  Most likely I will watch this fight a week later when HBO replays it. 14-1 is crazy.

                  Comment

                  • hectari
                    Power to the People
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 22896
                    • 1,430
                    • 768
                    • 131,802

                    #39
                    Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
                    *goes to Vegas and puts $5 on PAC*
                    Some of you guys aren't smart. Remember wasn't Bradley like a 10 to 1 underdog or something like that in the first fight with Pac? and he won! Betting 100 or so on Chris is the best bet you can make for a quick return.

                    Chris can win this.

                    And we all know Pac is not safe for a decision, after Bradley won the first fight so its anyones game.

                    this isnt Mayweather Maidana where nobody can win a decision over Floyd.

                    Comment

                    • Fetta
                      nob cheese
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16696
                      • 417
                      • 3
                      • 24,315

                      #40
                      Originally posted by kurupt1019
                      you gotta split the difference, so if floyd was -1200 and maidana was +700,

                      the true odds would be 9.5 to 1, gotta split the juice to get "true ******** odds"
                      +950'was the highest i found maidana at.

                      Im expecting algeri to be around +1100

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP