It's funny considering what Arum said about Maidana.... but this line will drop a lot lower way before the fight.
Pacquiao opens up as a 14-1 favorite
Collapse
-
Lol tell these noobs. People just hear arum say 18-1 then run with itComment
-
you gotta split the difference, so if floyd was -1200 and maidana was +700,No, it's not technically correct to say that. It's making something up, to say that. Maidana wasn't an 18/1 underdog. Period. The only way it's correct to say he's an 18/1 underdog, is if you can bet on him at 18/1. I mean, that's why these odds exist. Imagine telling someone that Maidana is an 18/1 dog, then they try to bet it, and get 7/1. They'll think you're a moron that doesn't know what he's saying.
And when we're talking about -1800 favorites, there's no reason in the world to juice it any higher than it needs to be. No one is laying $1800 to win $100.
the true odds would be 9.5 to 1, gotta split the juice to get "true ******** odds"Comment
-
Are you denying that you could've bet Floyd at -1800?No, it's not technically correct to say that. It's making something up, to say that. Maidana wasn't an 18/1 underdog. Period. The only way it's correct to say he's an 18/1 underdog, is if you can bet on him at 18/1. I mean, that's why these odds exist. Imagine telling someone that Maidana is an 18/1 dog, then they try to bet it, and get 7/1. They'll think you're a moron that doesn't know what he's saying.
And when we're talking about -1800 favorites, there's no reason in the world to juice it any higher than it needs to be. No one is laying $1800 to win $100.
I know you've seen that pic I had
That means that according to that oddsmaker, If Floyd and Maidana fought 19 times, Floyd would win 18 of them. Thats what it means to be a 18-1 underdog
Imagine it was the other way around and Maidana was a +700 to win. Would you tell people that Floyd was only a -700?
No, because your supposed to go by the odds placed on the favorite
And experienced betters know that boxing odds aren't 1:1. You always have to pay more juice when picking a favorite. If they don't know that than they are the idiotsComment
-
http://**********boxing.com/marcos-m...-in-the-world/
Jenna J: Odds makers have you as wide as a 14-1 underdog.
respected boxing journalist jenna j confirmed it.
sportsbook.com had maidana as 14-1 underdog.Comment
-
That's exactly what I'm saying. If Maidana is a 7/1 underdog, it doesn't mean Floyd is a 1/7 favorite. If you can't bet on Maidana at 18/1, then Maidana is NOT 18/1. That's all there is to it, man.Are you denying that you could've bet Floyd at -1800?
I know you've seen that pic I had
That means that according to that oddsmaker, If Floyd and Maidana fought 19 times, Floyd would win 18 of them. Thats what it means to be a 18-1 underdog
Imagine it was the other way around and Maidana was a +700 to win. Would you tell people that Floyd was only a -700?
No, because your supposed to go by the odds placed on the favorite
And experienced betters know that boxing odds aren't 1:1. You always have to pay more juice when picking a favorite. If they don't know that than they are the idiotsComment
-
Some of you guys aren't smart. Remember wasn't Bradley like a 10 to 1 underdog or something like that in the first fight with Pac? and he won! Betting 100 or so on Chris is the best bet you can make for a quick return.
Chris can win this.
And we all know Pac is not safe for a decision, after Bradley won the first fight so its anyones game.
this isnt Mayweather Maidana where nobody can win a decision over Floyd.Comment
-
Comment
Comment