Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread
Collapse
-
Fury did foul his way to victory.
Cunningham is a good fighter and multiple time champ though.
Fury is a proper underdog.
He could pull it off, doe.Comment
-
But that fight doesn't reflect how he fights.
I have no problems with your wording, but mentioning that he was losing on the cards is just strange. If Cunningham had gotten up from that last punch Fury would have been drawing two cards and winning one. It's not as if he was getting schooled and found a lucky punch, he was clearly winning the fight.Comment
-
Pfft, pull your tongue out of his arse, he's so boring and he's a nailed on try-hard, trying to be funny and it just comes off as cringy! I cringed the whole way through that video. As soon as Fury beats this boring stiff idiot i hope he retires...**** the rematch.Comment
-
A few years ago I give Fury no chance but now he is focused, has improved his skills, can fight in both stances & is very big. This is no gimme in my opinion. I still don't give Fury much chance but Wlad is 39 & if Fury catches him you never know...Comment
-
Pfft, pull your tongue out of his arse, he's so boring and he's a nailed on try-hard, trying to be funny and it just comes off as cringy! I cringed the whole way through that video. As soon as Fury beats this boring stiff idiot i hope he retires...**** the rematch.Comment
-
If people think Fury is going to go charging into Wlad with his hands at his waist and his chin in the air like he did against Cunningham; I suggest they watch some of Fury's recent fights.
He's a more polished and refined boxer now and doesn't go looking for a tear up.
I have no idea why people keep bringing up the Cunningham fight tbh. It's like bringing up Wlad's Brewster or Sanders fights. Has no relevance on how they fight now.Comment
-
I'm actually surprised by how many people are giving Fury any sort of a chance. People seem to forget he was losing on the cards against Steve Cunningham and was down in the second round.
Steve fuckin' Cunningham!
He was losing the battle of the jabs and being outboxed by a blown up cruiserweight. Fury hasn't fought another top heavyweight either. Cunningham might actually be his best win and he was losing that fight.
It will be very telling on 28th November who is the better boxer, I have no doubt about that. All Fury has to go off is him outworking Wlad. He doesn't have the boxing ability or the punching power and he's far too sloppy and careless to last the distance.
Is Wlad going to go all out, blow his load in the fifth, go into a panic attack and get knocked out like he did against Brewster? No, obviously he isn't. So credit Fury with the same sense not to fight like a complete buffoon.Comment
-
If people think Fury is going to go charging into Wlad with his hands at his waist and his chin in the air like he did against Cunningham; I suggest they watch some of Fury's recent fights.
He's a more polished and refined boxer now and doesn't go looking for a tear up.
I have no idea why people keep bringing up the Cunningham fight tbh. It's like bringing up Wlad's Brewster or Sanders fights. Has no relevance on how they fight now.
I understand it's the last time Fury truly looked vulnerable, and is therefore going to be brought up as a point of criticism and ridicule by those looking to downgrade Tyson, but at this point it has about as much pertinence as Wlad's losses to 'fat golfer' Sanders and 'sprung like a dawg' Brewster. It's fine for a chuckle at the fighter's expense but doesn't have any bearing on how the actual fight is going to play out in the here and now. Wlad isn't going to go all guns blazing and gas himself out and Fury isn't going to fight like a sloppy caveman with his hands at his sides and his chin in the air. Maybe it'd be a better fight if they did, but that's unlikely how it's going to play out.Comment
Comment