Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[KnockoutNed]

Are you touched mentally? Just asking. You know there's a website with boxing records and results right?

Hey kliturd, if Wlad really beat Williamson , ask yourself why Sleep got the shot against Byrd instead of Wlad?

Because the IBF federation saw that Wlad pulled a disgraceful quit job and got a bogus victory thus deciding not to rank him above Williamson.

Instead he filed a law suit so he wouldn't have to face Williamson again. He wanted no part of Williamson anymore since the style was all wrong for him.

[Boxing Goat]

A simple, "yea, I'm touched" would have sufficed.

[KnockoutNed]

That's it then? The Kliturd hides behind an ad hominem, as per usual.

[Elroy1]

Hey kliturd, if Wlad really beat Williamson , ask yourself why Sleep got the shot against Byrd instead of Wlad?

Because the IBF federation saw that Wlad pulled a disgraceful quit job and got a bogus victory thus deciding not to rank him above Williamson.

Instead he filed a law suit so he wouldn't have to face Williamson again. He wanted no part of Williamson anymore since the style was all wrong for him.

Wlad did beat Williamson, he was ahead at time of stoppage.

Tell me, who would you have in the rematch???

Only an absolute tool like you would pick against WlAD, even against opponents he DID in fact lose to the first time!!

[Elroy1]

This thread has started to bring out the dregs of the forum, guys like Billeau and KnockOutNed that have no place in reality and should be confined to History.

Bottom-line...

Wladimir has only ever lost by way of fluke and there has been no flukes in over a decade.

And if Tyson Fury wins, it will ALSO be a fluke.

Trouble is, "punching power" and "hard chin" are two necessary conditions for Wladimir to lose by fluke, even before anything else is considered.

Does Fury have these qualities? PRobably not!

Therefore his CHANCES of pulling another fluke are pretty low.

[beez721]

That's it then? The Kliturd hides behind an ad hominem, as per usual.

wlad was at his absolute worst when he fought williamson. it was right after that brewster fight when his confidence was at a low. anyway,,he was ahead in that fight and didnt seem hurt from that flash knockdown. in fact he dominated the rest of that round

[LacedUp]

Wladimir has only ever lost by way of fluke

This is infinitely idiotic

[beez721]

This is infinitely idiotic

his losses werent flukes but he did pretty much beat himself to a degree against purrity and brewster by not pacing himself properly. sanders was a diifferent story tho. he did a number on wlad and I think his style would have always been a problem for wlad. he just couldnt see that left hand coming

[LacedUp]

his losses werent flukes but he did pretty much beat himself to a degree against purrity and brewster by not pacing himself properly. sanders was a diifferent story tho. he did a number on wlad and I think his style would have always been a problem for wlad. he just couldnt see that left hand coming

So? In every loss there's mistakes along the way. That's why they are losses. Saying it were flukes is completely idiotic and it screams denial.

All (most) fighters take a loss at some stage in their careers. You learn from it and improve.

He wasn't screwed out of a win, wasn't cheated on the scorecards, didn't even lose a shoulder or something. He lost completely fair and square three times.

He learned and moved on.

[beez721]

So? In every loss there's mistakes along the way. That's why they are losses. Saying it were flukes is completely idiotic and it screams denial.

All (most) fighters take a loss at some stage in their careers. You learn from it and improve.

He wasn't screwed out of a win, wasn't cheated on the scorecards, didn't even lose a shoulder or something. He lost completely fair and square three times.

He learned and moved on.

ohh,,,I agree they werent fluke losses