Lamon Brewster Bout Set!!

[Torino]

Fact: Brewster has fought more frequently and agaisnt better opposition than anyone that holds a title. This is including Vitali before he retired

And yet another eruption of deception from the fart canyon known as Bozo.

I will provide actual facts supported with actual numbers,

Vitali fought twice a year,every year since 1999 when he fought four fights, winning the WBO title in one and defending it twice. Vitali's final four fights happened over a 24 month span. Vitali has fought in seven title fights.

Vitali
2 fights in 2004
2 fights in 2003
2 fights in 2002
2 fights in 2001
2 fights in 2000
4 fights in 1999
10 fights in 1998
10 fights in 1997
3 fights in 1996

Brewsters last four fights happened over a 25 month span. Brewster has fought in four title fights.

Brewster
2 fights in 2005
2 fights in 2004
1 fight in 2003
3 fights in 2002
1 fight in 2001
4 fights in 2000
2 fights in 1999
7 fights in 1998
9 fights in 1997
4 fights in 1996

From 1999-2004 Vitali had 14 fights and Brewster had 13.

From 1996-1998 Vitali had 23 fights and Brewster had 20.

As you can see, Bozo is a bias hating boob who can't be trusted to tell the truth. He deliberately falsifies facts to support his agenda.

[Bozo_no no]

And yet another eruption of deception from the fart canyon known as Bozo.

I will provide actual facts supported with actual numbers,

Vitali fought twice a year,every year since 1999 when he fought four fights, winning the WBO title in one and defending it twice. Vitali's final four fights happened over a 24 month span. Vitali has fought in seven title fights.

Vitali
2 fights in 2004
2 fights in 2003
2 fights in 2002
2 fights in 2001
2 fights in 2000
4 fights in 1999
10 fights in 1998
10 fights in 1997
3 fights in 1996

Brewsters last four fights happened over a 25 month span. Brewster has fought in four title fights.

Brewster
2 fights in 2005
2 fights in 2004
1 fight in 2003
3 fights in 2002
1 fight in 2001
4 fights in 2000
2 fights in 1999
7 fights in 1998
9 fights in 1997
4 fights in 1996

From 1999-2004 Vitali had 14 fights and Brewster had 13.

From 1996-1998 Vitali had 23 fights and Brewster had 20.

As you can see, Bozo is a bias hating boob who can't be trusted to tell the truth. He deliberately tries to pass off his opinion as fact knowing it's untrue.

You're a trolling idiot, and as usual, you are back on this site crying about the Klitschkos. It's all you do, and the only reason you come here.

What Brewster and Vitali did prior to 2004 doesn't have any bearing on their activity and competition level as TITLE HOLDERS.

Since winning his title against Corrie Sanders, he defended it ONCE agaisnt Danny Williams.

Brewster won his title from Wlad, and defended it three times.

In his last 5 fights, he's fought better competition than Vitali did in his ONE defense agaisnt Williams.

I realize this is upsetting to you, but it's the truth.

Vitali made one ****ty defense of the vacent title he won, and retired having proved nothing.

The point of this thread, is that while this isn't an exciting fight for Brewster, it's not that bad considering how inactive (and what ****ty competition) his counter parts have been facing.

[badblood]

The point is Maskaev was a ****ty fighter, fighting ****ty fights, and you felt the need to desperatly defend him.

Now Brewster, the most active title holder who's been fighting stiffer compeition than his counter parts, is taking a tune up fight, and it's "a waste of everyone's time".

But Maskaev, and the last four years isn't a waste of everyone's time? Maskaev getting a title shot wouldn't have been a waste of everyone's time?

You don't think, and your logic is poor.

Again bozo, Maskaev vs Sam was a mandatory was it not?? I could have thought of 10 other fights that I could have wanted to see but that was what they gave us and I would atleast expect the sanctioning body to have followed their own rules. I am not one of these Brewster haters so I'm not going to sit here and try to discredit him but I am going to sit here and say loudly that this fight he just signed is a steaming pile of **** and is an absolute waste of everybodies time. S.Lyk has done nothing, not even an eliminator, nothing. Call it a tune up fight all you want but call it what it is.........a giant steaming pile of ****.

[Torino]

You're a trolling idiot, and as usual, you are back on this site crying about the Klitschkos. It's all you do, and the only reason you come here.

What Brewster and Vitali did prior to 2004 doesn't have any bearing on their activity and competition level as TITLE HOLDERS.

Since winning his title against Corrie Sanders, he defended it ONCE agaisnt Danny Williams.

Brewster won his title from Wlad, and defended it three times.

In his last 5 fights, he's fought better competition than Vitali did in his ONE defense agaisnt Williams.

I realize this is upsetting to you, but it's the truth.

Vitali made one ****ty defense of the vacent title he won, and retired having proved nothing.

The point of this thread, is that while this isn't an exciting fight for Brewster, it's not that bad considering how inactive (and what ****ty competition) his counter parts have been facing.

[Bozo_no no]

Again bozo, Maskaev vs Sam was a mandatory was it not?? I could have thought of 10 other fights that I could have wanted to see but that was what they gave us and I would atleast expect the sanctioning body to have followed their own rules. I am not one of these Brewster haters so I'm not going to sit here and try to dicredit him but I am going to sit here and say loudly that this fight he just signed is a steaming pile of **** and is an absolute waste of everybodies time. S.Lyk has done nothing, not even an eliminator, nothing. Call it a tune up fight all you want but call it what it is.........a giant steaming pile of ****.

The point I've tried to make to you 100 times over, was that it doesn't matter what the sanctioning bodies think or say in determining a steaming pile of ****.

Maskev getting a title shot would have been a steaming pile of ****, and you condoned this.

Now Brewster, who's fights in the last few years have been less steaming and less ****ty than any other of the title holders, is taking a tune up, and it's a steaming pile of ****.

You thought Maskev getting a title shot was a positive thing that should have happened despite him figthing WORSE fights than this one for 3 straight years.

[Bozo_no no]

Great response.

When you don't have anything to say, resort to acting like a *****.

Any chance you'll post on any other topic here today? Or is this just like every other time you drop in to cry about the Klitschkos and leave for months at a time?

You don't like boxing, and you come here to ***** and cry about the Klitschkos. You are a complete waste to this site, and to your own time.

[badblood]

The point I've tried to make to you 100 times over, was that it doesn't matter what the sanctioning bodies think or say in determining a steaming pile of ****.

Maskev getting a title shot would have been a steaming pile of ****, and you condoned this.

Now Brewster, who's fights in the last few years have been less steaming and less ****ty than any other of the title holders, is taking a tune up, and it's a steaming pile of ****.

You thought Maskev getting a title shot was a positive thing that should have happened despite him figthing WORSE fights than this one for 3 straight years.

I'm also not the one who made it a mandatory, they did. I just expect to see the same sanctioning body that was sued into bankrupcy not that long ago to follow their own rules. Brewster could have at least picked a live body to defend against, hell I would have rather seen him fight a combacking Mo harris then this guy.

[Bozo_no no]

I'm also not the one who made it a mandatory, they did. I just expect to see the same sanctioning body that was sued into bankrupcy not that long ago to follow their own rules. Brewster could have at least picked a live body to defend against, hell I would have rather seen him fight a combacking Mo harris then this guy.

Maybe he can fight this guy, spend 3 years fighting guys like him or worse, and then get a mandatory and you'll stick up for him.

Sound about right?

[badblood]

Maybe he can fight this guy, spend 3 years fighting guys like him or worse, and then get a mandatory and you'll stick up for him.

Sound about right?

I watched the IBF ride his nuts for 2 years so when I say I've seen worse i mean it.

[Torino]

In his last 5 fights, he's fought better competition than Vitali did in his ONE defense agaisnt Williams.

Brewsters last five,

2005-09-28 Luan Krasniqi"Title fight"
2005-05-21 Andrew Golota "Title fight"
2004-09-04 Kali Meehan "Title fight"
2004-04-10 W Klitschko"Title fight"
2003-03-01 Joe Lenhart

Vitalis last five,

2004-12-11 Danny Williams "Title fight"
2004-04-24 Corrie Sanders "Title fight"
2003-12-06 Kirk Johnson "Eliminator"
2003-06-21 Lennox Lewis "Title fight"
2002-11-23 Larry Donald

BREWSTER FIGHTS BETTER OPPOSITION?
Vitalis last five opponents W-L record
184-10-4

Brewsters last five opponents W-L record
147-25-5

Like I said, Bozo is a bias hating boob who can't be trusted to tell the truth. He deliberately falsifies facts to support his agenda.

LETS SEE YOUR FACTS BOOBSO