Originally posted by Bozo_no no
Lamon Brewster Bout Set!!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by badbloodListen here ****tard, you start watching boxing 1-2 years ago and you DL some fights to catch up on some learning. You dont know jack **** fella. You wonder why people dont come in this section to talk boxing, it's because people like yourself start talking **** because you feel threatened because somebody acutualy watches boxing. I'm no fair weather fan and I've watched this ****ing sport since I ws a kid and for you to come into this thread just to start some **** is ****ing ******. ****ing ****** mother****er **** you.
You know more about swearing than you do boxing.
I've watched boxing since I was a kid, and I have thousands of fights on tape.
Boxing knowledge is reflected in what you say and how you back it up, and you are obviosuly a hack. You can't back up anything you say, and it shows.
You started this thread to ***** about a tune up fight. When I pointed out other title holders have been far more guilty of this, you got upset.
You were the one who was crushed that Oleg Maskiev wasn't getting a title shot, yet every fight he's had since 2002 has been as bad or worse than this.
You can't back up what you say, and when someone calls you on one of your weak points you turn into a little *****, as is evident in this post I've quoted here.Comment
-
Originally posted by Bozo_no noYou know more about swearing than you do boxing.
I've watched boxing since I was a kid, and I have thousands of fights on tape.
Boxing knowledge is reflected in what you say and how you back it up, and you are obviosuly a hack. You can't back up anything you say, and it shows.
You started this thread to ***** about a tune up fight. When I pointed out other title holders have been far more guilty of this, you got upset.
You were the one who was crushed that Oleg Maskiev wasn't getting a title shot, yet every fight he's had since 2002 has been as bad or worse than this.
You can't back up what you say, and when someone calls you on one of your weak points you turn into a little *****, as is evident in this post I've quoted here.Comment
-
Originally posted by badbloodNo dude your wrong. Go read your first ****ing post in this ****ing thread and then come back and tell me some more ****** ****. I have explained in full detail about the Maskaev situation and I'm not going into it again because you suffer from tunnel vision and you flock with the sheep. To call me a hack is laughable but if that's what you want to think then by all means think it cause I know better and you know better it just makes you feel so mighty and clean. I have always been able to back up my **** with facts and all you can do is talk **** like a 13 year old punk.
Let's review:
- Brewster taking a tune up fight is a waste of everyone's time
- Oleg Maskaev fighting poor fights like this (and worse) over a 4 year span somehow earns him a title shot.
This is fantastic logic champ.
Again: Anyone who's had a title in the last few years has fought worse opposition than Brewster, and less frequently.
It's a tune up fight to stay busy.Comment
-
Originally posted by Bozo_no noLet's review:
- Brewster taking a tune up fight is a waste of everyone's time
- Oleg Maskaev fighting poor fights like this (and worse) over a 4 year span somehow earns him a title shot.
This is fantastic logic champ.
Again: Anyone who's had a title in the last few years has fought worse opposition than Brewster, and less frequently.
It's a tune up fight to stay busy.Comment
-
Originally posted by badbloodNo **** bozo, that's what I said in post #1 and you are the only one talking about Maskaev.
You said it's a waste of everyone's time, and then tried to act like Vitali Klitschko fighting Danny Williams was so much better than this.
I realize you don't like me bringing up Maskaev, because you have no answer for Brewster taking one tune up fight being a waste of time, but Maskaev does it for four straight years and he deserves a title shot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bozo_no noYou said it's a waste of everyone's time, and then tried to act like Vitali Klitschko fighting Danny Williams was so much better than this.
I realize you don't like me bringing up Maskaev, because you have no answer for Brewster taking one tune up fight being a waste of time, but Maskaev does it for four straight years and he deserves a title shot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by badbloodGo back and read this thread bozo. I said Brewster/Williams and I have yet to mention any of the Klits. Once again bozo the WBC issued a mandatory #1 vs #2 and Maskaev won the fight and the WBC went back on their word and I have told you a million times now it did'nt matter if it was Maskaev or whoever it was wrong and not fair to the promised FIGHTER. The fighter happened to be Maskaev and now in your eyes I swing from his nuts. Fact is I'm not the one who declared the Maskaev/Sam fight to be a mandatory the WBC did. The WBC decided to go with Toney and I spoke up and said wait a minute WTF is going on?? Now in your eyes because I said WTF I swing from this guys nuts, frustrating that I have had to explain this to you a million times.
The point is Maskaev was a ****ty fighter, fighting ****ty fights, and you felt the need to desperatly defend him.
Now Brewster, the most active title holder who's been fighting stiffer compeition than his counter parts, is taking a tune up fight, and it's "a waste of everyone's time".
But Maskaev, and the last four years isn't a waste of everyone's time? Maskaev getting a title shot wouldn't have been a waste of everyone's time?
You don't think, and your logic is poor.Comment
Comment