Do you think Crawford is a better boxer than porter and thurman?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NearHypnos
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 6271
    • 369
    • 12
    • 47,632

    #31
    Thurman or Porter havent had the chance to prove it against good opposition but I think it'd be safe to say he's a better boxer than Porter. For Thurman that remains to be seen. Thurman couldpotentially be

    Comment

    • Outwest Exp 355
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2012
      • 9761
      • 1,183
      • 921
      • 47,595

      #32
      Originally posted by Bushbaby
      Now while I think Crawford is probably better pfp than Porter and Thurman, no he won't beat those welterweights. But Mathed can you please explain to me exactly how you came up with the (theory) or Thurman being protected and this guy why do you agree?
      Haymon has a way of building up his talent. He did it with Broner, Berto, Charo Bros, and now Thurman. Sure they want to fight the best but they also want to be on the A side of negotiations. Thurman's resume is weak but if you look at it he's fought the kind of opposition Haymon is willing to pay for. You can't get top contenders in the ring for 90 to 100 grand. So he gets stuck fighting the Diaz' of the world. Top opposition is going to cost multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars if not millions.

      Comment

      • -MEGA-
        THE DON
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2013
        • 10728
        • 2,087
        • 1,433
        • 422,560,632

        #33
        IMO Crawford by far the better boxer of the three hands down. Let me know when either of those guys could outbox an Olympic gold medalist as a southpaw...
        Last edited by -MEGA-; 06-29-2014, 08:34 AM.

        Comment

        • The Viper
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2012
          • 1983
          • 67
          • 39
          • 31,657

          #34
          Ok Guys I put a poll up let's vote!!!!!!

          Comment

          • -PBP-
            32 Time World Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2012
            • 24107
            • 836
            • 635
            • 34,297

            #35
            Originally posted by DonMega
            IMO Crawford by far the better boxer of the three hands down. Let me know when either of those guys could outbox an Olympic gold medalist as a southpaw...
            Exactly. Class will tell over time. Just sit back and watch it unfold

            Comment

            • Bushbaby
              Wild Apache
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 23513
              • 727
              • 370
              • 32,078

              #36
              Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
              Haymon has a way of building up his talent. He did it with Broner, Berto, Charo Bros, and now Thurman. Sure they want to fight the best but they also want to be on the A side of negotiations. Thurman's resume is weak but if you look at it he's fought the kind of opposition Haymon is willing to pay for. You can't get top contenders in the ring for 90 to 100 grand. So he gets stuck fighting the Diaz' of the world. Top opposition is going to cost multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars if not millions.
              And how do you know what Haymon was willing to pay? May I have some proof of the Ghost's and Maidana's proposed purses please. That way I can become a believer.

              Comment

              • DondiNeverLeft
                RedKmakes U happy lol
                • Mar 2010
                • 3299
                • 247
                • 31
                • 9,700

                #37
                Originally posted by The Viper
                Do you think he could beat them at welterweight? I do you think his skills is better he's like andre ward in a lot of ways.
                Crawford showed masterful boxing. Yes skill wise he is better than Porter and Thurman.

                Porter overwhelms pretty much like Pac. While Thurman is KO fighter with some skill.

                Comment

                • The Viper
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2012
                  • 1983
                  • 67
                  • 39
                  • 31,657

                  #38
                  Originally posted by DonMega
                  IMO Crawford by far the better boxer of the three hands down. Let me know when either of those guys could outbox an Olympic gold medalist as a southpaw...
                  Damn don mega you droppin that ISM!!!!!!!

                  Man that's the truth....

                  Comment

                  • Butt stuff
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 5740
                    • 1,277
                    • 3,513
                    • 17,572

                    #39
                    I still think if they were the same size, thurman would pull out a win. Not sure if Crawford is P4P yet, but hes definetely a fighter to watch and he's just created a myriad of great match up possibilities with the way he dispatched Gamboa

                    Comment

                    • GoldenGloveLove
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 2105
                      • 98
                      • 69
                      • 10,496

                      #40
                      He's more skilled than Porter, and MAYBE Thurman but if either of those guys land on him like Gamboa did in the first four rounds he may not have time to adjust before getting stopped.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP