Do you think he could beat them at welterweight? I do you think his skills is better he's like andre ward in a lot of ways.
Do you think Crawford is a better boxer than porter and thurman?
Collapse
-
-
Mentally, on another level. Physically, I doubt his fire power. I think Thurman could overwhelm him on sheer physicality. Porter is kind of basic, but he's a really big boy.Comment
-
Better boxer than Porter, but not better than Thurman. I think Thurman is the most well rounded of them all (ignore my signature and avatar).
I still think he'll be great and they will all probably reach similar levels. He looked very sharp tonight after the first three rounds - he really showed his ring IQ.Comment
-
-
He was being outboxed by a 5'5 featherweight with a reach disadvantage.
His success came from Gamboa's lack of any type of defense in exchanges and yes his ability to take his shots and hurt his opponent size had a lot to do with this win.Comment
-
I had honestly never seen Crawford fight before besides looking up his fight with burns earlier today. Early on I was thinking Hearns as crazy as that sounds. Granted Gamboa was small. Complete boxer, and he showed that he has some pop. Hard to beat a guy who is so technically sound, who can punch. First fight that got me excited in awhile, which is why this is the first time I have posted on here in multiple years.Comment
-
I think he's a better boxer than both but Crawford is made for 140, anyone at 147 would hurt him bad and this is coming from a Crawford fan whos been raving about his abilities for a while nowComment
Comment