Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How is Mayweather beating GGG a better win than beating Cotto at MW?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by B.U.R.N.E.R View Post
    Fair enough if thats how tyou feel about a rematch. I thought Floyd won clearly at JMW vs Cotto but then again confidence as you know is a bytch in boxing and so is a better corner which provides.

    I do agree Golovkin needs to move up hell Cotto moved up 20lbs. Can GGG move up 8 FFS?




    Save the name calling or youll be on my ignore list. Lets talk boxing. Like I told derranged confidence in boxing is a bytch and a better corner goes a long way. This fight also wouldnt be at a catch weight. Weight classes exist for a reason. Its not the same fight imo.

    Now onto your GGG assessment I see 2-3 things:

    1. Hes undefeated
    2. He has a good AM background
    3. Prime? Maybe hes what 32, 33 something like that. And has truly fought no one worth a damn.

    I still dont see how beating an unproven guy who has never showed his fighting ability against a half decent fighter makes it a great win for Floyd. Having a good AM background isnt good enough for me nor should it be for you.
    lets talk boxing lmao...
    Your nose is literally all brown its not capable of having a rational debate with you without your Floyd nuthugging ways setting into full!

    Why doesn't Floyd fight at 160?
    Why all the excuses to protect this phony cherry picker such a huge bumsniff

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
      God you're ******ed burner. Floyd already beat Cotto. Beating him at a different weight class isn't proving anything. Floyd could beat Cotto at cruiserweight, doesn't matter.

      GGG on the other hand is a true middleweight, in his prime, undefeated with a phenomenal amateur background as well. It would say a lot more for Floyd to beat a guy like GGG than to beat a guy he already beat.
      who gives a **** about amateur background......wtf has he done in the pros? thats like saying tim tebow is a great qb because of what he's done in college. cotto beat's ggg at 160 and floyd destroys him at 154.

      Comment


      • #13
        Cotto had a great victory against Martinez. Cotto had his shot at Floyd. Move on...

        Comment


        • #14
          The OP is correct. Even though it's unlikely that Floyd would consider fighting GGG (very high risk/extremely low reward), but if he were to do it and beat GGG he'd get very little credit for it (even less than he usually does). GGG has don't nothing in the sport so far and is only praised by boxing hipsters. I don't want to see Mayweather-Cotto II though, think it's a pointless match.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by B.U.R.N.E.R View Post
            Fair enough if thats how you feel about a rematch. I thought Floyd won clearly at JMW vs Cotto but then again confidence as you know is a bytch in boxing and so is a better corner which Roach without question provides.

            I do agree Golovkin needs to move up hell Cotto moved up 20lbs. Can GGG move up 8 FFS?




            Save the name calling or youll be on my ignore list BRUH. Lets talk boxing. Like I told derranged confidence in boxing is a bytch and a better corner goes a long way. This fight also wouldnt be at a catch weight. Weight classes exist for a reason. Its not the same fight imo.

            Now onto your GGG assessment I see 2-3 things:

            1. Hes undefeated
            2. He has a good AM background
            3. Prime? Maybe hes what 32, 33 something like that. And has truly fought no one worth a damn.

            I still dont see how beating an unproven guy who has never showed his fighting ability against a half decent fighter makes it a great win for Floyd or Cotto. Having a good AM background isnt good enough for me nor should it be for you.


            Lol at being so sensitive you threaten placing people on your ignore list. Pussy ass faggot I'll fuck you till you love me faggot. Welcome to more ignore list ****.
            Last edited by ИATAS; 06-10-2014, 11:48 AM.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Xi_ View Post
              who gives a **** about amateur background......wtf has he done in the pros? thats like saying tim tebow is a great qb because of what he's done in college. cotto beat's ggg at 160 and floyd destroys him at 154.
              Obviously amateur background can mean a hell of a lot. What did Rigondeaux accomplish as a pro before beating Donaire? He beat Rico Ramos.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Xi_ View Post
                who gives a **** about amateur background......wtf has he done in the pros? thats like saying tim tebow is a great qb because of what he's done in college. cotto beat's ggg at 160 and floyd destroys him at 154.
                Yeah I mean Ive seen every fight of his since he kind of broke out and Ouma, Simon, Prokska, Rosado, Stevens, Adama, Macklin, Ishida that aint gon cut it.


                What has he really proved in the sport of boxing? I get it hes exciting, hes entertaining, he punches hard. So say you like watching him fight then. I mean if Cotto/Floyd beat GGG tomorrow are people going to really come in here screaming it was a glorious life changing win? And if so why?


                What has he done? Who has he fought? What has he shown you? I mean cmon enough already. NSB has gone full ****** with this bs.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                  The blown up welter holds the lineal mw belt. Hows that not fair game? The other blown up welter is lineal at 154, and his fans are salivating over the possibility of another catchweight lineal belt at mw. If these guys are too small, probably shouldnt be going for them lineal belts much less sitting on them without defending vs legit divisional comp
                  Floyd is too small for middleweight and you're right, he shouldn't be fighting for any belt at that weight. Since Cotto has fought and beat a middleweight, I'd say he's fair game. But I think he'd be biting off more than he can chew.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Xi_ View Post
                    who gives a **** about amateur background......wtf has he done in the pros? thats like saying tim tebow is a great qb because of what he's done in college. cotto beat's ggg at 160 and floyd destroys him at 154.
                    Goddamn these flo mos are disgraceful POS. I bet this guy starts crying not fair every time theres a ggg vs floyd at 154 thread

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Because ggg is the boogie man and sounds like a bond villian and says funny things after a fight. I guess

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP