Broner mocks "boring" Cotto vs Martinez fight
Collapse
-
-
Actually no it wasn't. The circumstances in this fight are different in the sense that Sergio is the bigger fighter and has exhibited the ability to take people out in one punch. Cotto isn't exactly an iron chinned guy either. To turn the fight off after four rounds simply because you think the writing is on the wall is monumentally f'n ******, especially if you paid $60 for it. There's really no way to justify it.Comment
-
lol, u see. this is what doesnt make sense. u base your arguments off of what u think i will say and do. im a big froch fan. i like him, i root for him more than i root for either fighter last night. stop grouping me. seriously, u make yourself look ignorant.It has nothing to do with that. It's the fact that you're a Floyd groupie and thought Cotto/Martinez was a "boring and horrible" fight. It's hilariously ironic. It's practically the same as the floyd stan calling Froch a hype job and should be a "warrior" and take on all comers.Comment
-
Urryybody tryin' to keep a slick brotha down.Who's talking about you not wanting Cotto to win? No-one mentioned that. (BTW, Pacquiao beat Cotto too, which is why Floyd stand have never really hyped up the Cotto win anyway).
YOUR FIRST INSTINCT, AS ALWAYS, WAS TO DEFEND BRONER'S ASS. THAT'S THE OVERRIDING THEME OF YOUR POSTS IN THIS THREAD.
YOU SPEND YOUR DAYS DEFENDING ADRIEN BRONER - A PATHETIC LITTLE BOY OUT OF HIS DEPTH IN THE SPORT OF BOXING.
WHAT KIND OF LIFE IS THIS, REALLY?
ONE THING MAYWEATHER/BRONER STANS JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND IS THAT BOTH THOSE TWO SUB-HUMANS HAVE CULTIVATED PERSONAS DESIGNED TO ANNOY AND ANTAGONISE PEOPLE. SO WHY THE FOOK DO YOU TARDS GET MAD WHEN PEOPLE, UH, YOU KNOW, GET ANNOYED WITH THEIR IDIOTIC WAYS? MAYWEATHER/BRONER ARE NOT EVEN COUNTING ON YOU LITTLE LOYAL FREAKSHOWS TO DEFEND THEM.
SO WHY DO IT?Comment
-
actually yes it was. u cant win a fight on one leg. sergio had no power behind his punches, his legs were unsteady, he was asking for ice for his knee in the corner. the fight was done. i knew it and it turned out to be the case. honestly u dont gotta like it, its not your business. doesnt mean i didnt do it because i did. u can check the rbr.Actually no it wasn't. The circumstances in this fight are different in the sense that Sergio is the bigger fighter and has exhibited the ability to take people out in one punch. Cotto isn't exactly an iron chinned guy either. To turn the fight off after four rounds simply because you think the writing is on the wall is monumentally f'n ******, especially if you paid $60 for it. There's really no way to justify it.Comment
-
What round did you turn off Mayweather-Guerrero? Mayweather-Canelo? Mayweather-Baldo? Mayweather-Marquez?
And what did you do once you switched it off after four rounds? I mean, god knows you couldn't bear to watch 20 more minutes of a sport you love. A sport that through history has shown fighters win through great adversity.
The idea of paying for a PPV fight and witnessing something quite significant in the boxing landscape but deciding to resolutely switch the channel off after four rounds is absolutely hilarious to me
Comment
-
You do know I alluded to the Froch part as an example to show the irony in both of your lines of thinking right? I made no indications that certain "floyd stan" that I referred to was in fact you. Read and comprehend what I say before you reply.Comment
-
I hate Mayweather and have mentally checked out early of so many of his fights because the outcome (and the way he was going about it) was so very boring to me.
Yet I have always watched to the bitter end, even when he's coasting against Baldo and Guerrero. I have never switched off. And I don't even pay for PPVs, I am streaming these fights.
Boxing is a sport where everything is compressed into a short space of time. It is one of the shortest sports around, even when it's played out in its entirety (12 rounds).
The idea of switching off a fight with huge significance in the boxing landscape after 4 rounds (when we still know Sergio has game-changing power, especially against Miguel's less than iron chin) is a staggering statement.
And most probably an outright lie.Comment
-
yes lets co mpare a bunch of unlike situations. floyd one sided all of those guys, boring fights. sure. now were any of those guys crippled?? now i ordered pac vs rios too, but yet i did not turn off that one sided ass whopping. now tell me the difference. i'll help u, since u seem to think its all about mayweather and broner. all of those fights, including the pac one, were against guys who were not husks of great fighters. those fighters could defend themselves, they may not have been in the fight but the werent what sergio was last night. it was quite a sad thing to witness. i even said so myself. i used to be a big serg fan until hia choice of oppostion became sketchy. i had no interest in seeing him get beat from pillar to post in a one sided asswhooping while asking to ice his knee. forgive me if i dont share your sentiments. but seriously, stop thinking u know me. u clearly dont.What round did you turn off Mayweather-Guerrero? Mayweather-Canelo? Mayweather-Baldo? Mayweather-Marquez?
And what did you do once you switched it off after four rounds? I mean, god knows you couldn't bear to watch 20 more minutes of a sport you love. A sport that through history has shown fighters win through great adversity.
The idea of paying for a PPV fight and witnessing something quite significant in the boxing landscape but deciding to resolutely switch the channel off after four rounds is absolutely hilarious to me
Comment
Comment