Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Broner mocks "boring" Cotto vs Martinez fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Garcia's Dad View Post
    LMAO at turning this fight off after 4 rounds

    That's either a blatant lie or monumentally ******ed.


    I wonder if Mayweather-Guerrero was turned off after 4 rounds too.....or was Mayweather's artistry too beautiful to switch off, especially the last 2 rounds cruising in the face of Robert's bone-crushing power.
    That's astronomically dumber than calling this particular fight "boring and horrible." To turn a fight, that you paid for, off after four rounds is just flat out ******ed.

    Comment


    • #42
      but i bet he loves to watch floyd fight?

      Comment


      • #43
        I mean seriously ppl want to make this about Floyd. Why the **** would a Floyd Stan not want cotto to win? Apply everything u know about fanboy logic and tell me how that's not ass backwards.

        Comment


        • #44
          (re-post as this post doesn't deserve to get lost in the shuffle at the bottom of the first page).


          Imagine if Mayweather had the audacity and balls to go for such a risky gamble as going after a fight with Sergio.....and then proceeded to beat him down like Miguel did.

          DO YOU THINK, FOR ONE SECOND, THAT DEMPSEY ROLLING WOULD BE UP IN THIS THREAD CALLING IT A BORING, HORRIBLE FIGHT?

          DO YOU THINK HE WOULD BE BOASTING ABOUT TURNING IT OFF AFTER FOUR ROUNDS?

          DO YOU THINK HE WOULD NOT BE CALLING THIS SITE "ASS-BACKWARD"S BECAUSE THE PACTURTS (GOD BLESS THEM) WOULD BE CALLING IT BORING?

          DO YOU THINK BRONER HIMSELF WOULD BE POSTING CLIPS OF HIM BEING BORED SENSELESS IF IT WAS MAYWEATHER IN THEIR DESTROYING SERGIO?

          PONDER THESE QUESTIONS. THE ANSWERS ARE FAIRLY APPARENT. SO THEN TELL ME WHY THE FOOK I SHOULD RESPECT THE VIEWS OF ADRIEN BRONER AND DEMPSEY ROLLING, WHEN YOU KNOW IF IT WAS MAYWEATHER DOING HIS THING RATHER THAN COTTO, THEY WOULD BE DRAINING TBE'S NUTS LIKE NOBODY'S BUSINESS AFTERWARDS

          WHAT DOES IT SAY WHEN THE NARRATIVE BUILT UP IN YOUR HEAD WOULD BE COMPLETELY REVERSED IF YOUR FAVOURITE FIGHT WAS INVOLVED IN THIS SCENARIO

          IT MEANS YOU ARE A WORTHLESS PIECE OF **** WHEN IT COMES TO BOXING DISCOURSE
          [/QUOTE]

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by badass316 View Post
            That's astronomically dumber than calling this particular fight "boring and horrible." To turn a fight, that you paid for, off after four rounds is just flat out ******ed.
            The outcome was there for everyone to see. There was next zero chance if a comeback. next. Too far down on the cards and too wobbly to land anything good. So yes I turned it off. Sergio didn't come close to winning one round. That did not change the entire fight.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Garcia's Dad View Post
              (re-post as this post doesn't deserve to get lost in the shuffle at the bottom of the first page).


              Imagine if Mayweather had the audacity and balls to go for such a risky gamble as going after a fight with Sergio.....and then proceeded to beat him down like Miguel did.

              DO YOU THINK, FOR ONE SECOND, THAT DEMPSEY ROLLING WOULD BE UP IN THIS THREAD CALLING IT A BORING, HORRIBLE FIGHT?

              DO YOU THINK HE WOULD BE BOASTING ABOUT TURNING IT OFF AFTER FOUR ROUNDS?

              DO YOU THINK HE WOULD NOT BE CALLIgNG THIS SITE "ASS-BACKWARD"S BECAUSE THE PACTURTS (GOD BLESS THEM) WOULD BE CALLING IT BORING?

              DO YOU THINK BRONER HIMSELF WOULD BE POSTING CLIPS OF HIM BEING BORED SENSELESS IF IT WAS MAYWEATHER IN THEIR DESTROYING SERGIO?

              PONDER THESE QUESTIONS. THE ANSWERS ARE FAIRLY APPARENT. SO THEN TELL ME WHY THE FOOK I SHOULD RESPECT THE VIEWS OF ADRIEN BRONER AND DEMPSEY ROLLING, WHEN YOU KNOW IF IT WAS MAYWEATHER DOING HIS THING RATHER THAN COTTO, THEY WOULD BE DRAINING TBE'S NUTS LIKE NOBODY'S BUSINESS AFTERWARDS

              WHAT DOES IT SAY WHEN THE NARRATIVE BUILT UP IN YOUR HEAD WOULD BE COMPLETELY REVERSED IF YOUR FAVOURITE FIGHT WAS INVOLVED IN THIS SCENARIO

              IT MEANS YOU ARE A WORTHLESS PIECE OF **** WHEN IT COMES TO BOXING DISCOURSE
              [/QUOTE]

              If Floyd fought that version of Sergio Martinez I would absolutely call it a horrible fight. In fact if Floyd now goes and fights Miguel cotto, I would call that an absolute ***** move. Because that's exactly what it is and opportunistic ***** move, which is exactly what cotto did. U can quote me u can do whatever u want. But the fact remains it is what it is. I called Floyd using the ******** to sell his fight a ***** move. I called Floyd not letting Maidana wear a commission approved gloves a ***** move. Really tell me I don't say abutujg negative about Floyd.
              Last edited by Kagami Taiga; 06-08-2014, 07:50 AM.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Garcia's Dad View Post
                (re-post as this post doesn't deserve to get lost in the shuffle at the bottom of the first page).


                Imagine if Mayweather had the audacity and balls to go for such a risky gamble as going after a fight with Sergio.....and then proceeded to beat him down like Miguel did.

                DO YOU THINK, FOR ONE SECOND, THAT DEMPSEY ROLLING WOULD BE UP IN THIS THREAD CALLING IT A BORING, HORRIBLE FIGHT?

                DO YOU THINK HE WOULD BE BOASTING ABOUT TURNING IT OFF AFTER FOUR ROUNDS?

                DO YOU THINK HE WOULD NOT BE CALLING THIS SITE "ASS-BACKWARD"S BECAUSE THE PACTURTS (GOD BLESS THEM) WOULD BE CALLING IT BORING?

                DO YOU THINK BRONER HIMSELF WOULD BE POSTING CLIPS OF HIM BEING BORED SENSELESS IF IT WAS MAYWEATHER IN THEIR DESTROYING SERGIO?

                PONDER THESE QUESTIONS. THE ANSWERS ARE FAIRLY APPARENT. SO THEN TELL ME WHY THE FOOK I SHOULD RESPECT THE VIEWS OF ADRIEN BRONER AND DEMPSEY ROLLING, WHEN YOU KNOW IF IT WAS MAYWEATHER DOING HIS THING RATHER THAN COTTO, THEY WOULD BE DRAINING TBE'S NUTS LIKE NOBODY'S BUSINESS AFTERWARDS

                WHAT DOES IT SAY WHEN THE NARRATIVE BUILT UP IN YOUR HEAD WOULD BE COMPLETELY REVERSED IF YOUR FAVOURITE FIGHT WAS INVOLVED IN THIS SCENARIO

                IT MEANS YOU ARE A WORTHLESS PIECE OF **** WHEN IT COMES TO BOXING DISCOURSE
                [/QUOTE]

                Yep certain fans only like watching a certain demographic of fighters

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
                  I mean seriously ppl want to make this about Floyd. Why the **** would a Floyd Stan not want cotto to win? Apply everything u know about fanboy logic and tell me how that's not ass backwards.
                  Who's talking about you not wanting Cotto to win? No-one mentioned that. (BTW, Pacquiao beat Cotto too, which is why Floyd stand have never really hyped up the Cotto win anyway).

                  YOUR FIRST INSTINCT, AS ALWAYS, WAS TO DEFEND BRONER'S ASS. THAT'S THE OVERRIDING THEME OF YOUR POSTS IN THIS THREAD.

                  YOU SPEND YOUR DAYS DEFENDING ADRIEN BRONER - A PATHETIC LITTLE BOY OUT OF HIS DEPTH IN THE SPORT OF BOXING.

                  WHAT KIND OF LIFE IS THIS, REALLY?

                  ONE THING MAYWEATHER/BRONER STANS JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND IS THAT BOTH THOSE TWO SUB-HUMANS HAVE CULTIVATED PERSONAS DESIGNED TO ANNOY AND ANTAGONISE PEOPLE. SO WHY THE FOOK DO YOU TARDS GET MAD WHEN PEOPLE, UH, YOU KNOW, GET ANNOYED WITH THEIR IDIOTIC WAYS? MAYWEATHER/BRONER ARE NOT EVEN COUNTING ON YOU LITTLE LOYAL FREAKSHOWS TO DEFEND THEM.

                  SO WHY DO IT?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
                    I mean seriously ppl want to make this about Floyd. Why the **** would a Floyd Stan not want cotto to win? Apply everything u know about fanboy logic and tell me how that's not ass backwards.
                    It has nothing to do with that. It's the fact that you're a Floyd groupie and thought Cotto/Martinez was a "boring and horrible" fight. It's hilariously ironic. It's practically the same as the floyd stan calling Froch a hype job and should be a "warrior" and take on all comers.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
                      The outcome was there for everyone to see. There was next zero chance if a comeback. next. Too far down on the cards and too wobbly to land anything good. So yes I turned it off. Sergio didn't come close to winning one round. That did not change the entire fight.
                      i gave martinez two rounds.

                      but i think it's silly to turn off a fight you paid good money for. at least see it through and witness history. isn't that worth it as a boxing fan?

                      i witnessed history and i almost cried that night it was beautiful. just like i almost cried when pacquiao made history when he beat cotto for that 7th world title in 7 weight classes. i get emotional when i see historic wins by good and humble champions.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP