Doing things like paying $1.2 million for Russell/Lomachenko, neither of which are under contract benefits the new company (if there is one) not GBP. No way GBP makes money on that. On top of that, getting Haymon to sign fighters, take them away from a company that you are a shareholder/CEO in and bring them over to a new one? And if GBP is unprofitable like has been speculated, what has he done to benefit the shareholders?
GBP had one of the deepest rosters in boxing at one point. Now they have Canelo, Mares and a few others.
Everybody can see what was going on for the past 12 months. It's just a matter of whether they can prove it.
GBP had one of the deepest rosters in boxing at one point. Now they have Canelo, Mares and a few others.
Everybody can see what was going on for the past 12 months. It's just a matter of whether they can prove it.
. You know, it's only because of this Cold War that people think promoters can only promote people under their banner. Boxing wasn't like that all!

Comment