It's a serious question to you hardcore boxing(more like boxer) fans.
Roy Jones takes andro and is praised as a god. Hell looking at another thread, people have him as the best in the last couple decades and some as one of the greatest of all time. Yet they fail to realize(or don't want to believe it) that he cheated before.
Shane Mosley, although he never tested positive, he comes out on record admitting that he cheated in a fight vs Oscar De La Hoya. Yet people still think he should be in the HOF and no su****ion on his fights.
James Toney, just like Jones & Mosley, this guy gets praised like nothing happened even after getting busted for cheating TWICE!
Erik Morales, dude was a warrior and one hell of an exciting fighter but he got caught taking something that he shouldn't, him being a warrior before excuses him for cheating.
Tito Trinidad, gets caught red handed by ****m Richardson, yet his nationalistic fans claim it as mind games and it is wrong to suspect him in previous fights.
There is more but I'll stop with those 4 examples. Now on to the su****ious boxers.
Pacquiao, though su****ious because the needle excuse and other things, he NEVER tested positive for anything illegal. But a group of fans(mostly made up of Mayweather/Broner/The Flashy Flash Peeps) seems to always suspect something beyond that when he does something great.
Marquez, I will admit that acne looks suspect as hell but it does not make it a fact that he takes anything illegal.
Cheater but still heavily criticized for su****ions....
Margarito, like Trinidad he got caught red handed by ****m Richardson however there is no proof that he did it in other fights. Do fans have the right to be su****ious? Absolutely! But it seems more people(specially two fan bases) are upset he beat up Cotto than trying to cheat vs Mosley(another cheater)
So what's your opinion on why su****ious people get it worse by fans than the ones that actually cheated?
Roy Jones takes andro and is praised as a god. Hell looking at another thread, people have him as the best in the last couple decades and some as one of the greatest of all time. Yet they fail to realize(or don't want to believe it) that he cheated before.
Shane Mosley, although he never tested positive, he comes out on record admitting that he cheated in a fight vs Oscar De La Hoya. Yet people still think he should be in the HOF and no su****ion on his fights.
James Toney, just like Jones & Mosley, this guy gets praised like nothing happened even after getting busted for cheating TWICE!
Erik Morales, dude was a warrior and one hell of an exciting fighter but he got caught taking something that he shouldn't, him being a warrior before excuses him for cheating.
Tito Trinidad, gets caught red handed by ****m Richardson, yet his nationalistic fans claim it as mind games and it is wrong to suspect him in previous fights.
There is more but I'll stop with those 4 examples. Now on to the su****ious boxers.
Pacquiao, though su****ious because the needle excuse and other things, he NEVER tested positive for anything illegal. But a group of fans(mostly made up of Mayweather/Broner/The Flashy Flash Peeps) seems to always suspect something beyond that when he does something great.
Marquez, I will admit that acne looks suspect as hell but it does not make it a fact that he takes anything illegal.
Cheater but still heavily criticized for su****ions....
Margarito, like Trinidad he got caught red handed by ****m Richardson however there is no proof that he did it in other fights. Do fans have the right to be su****ious? Absolutely! But it seems more people(specially two fan bases) are upset he beat up Cotto than trying to cheat vs Mosley(another cheater)
So what's your opinion on why su****ious people get it worse by fans than the ones that actually cheated?
Comment