Comments Thread For: ESPN: Stiverne-Arreola Bout Was Ratings Success

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #11
    Wlad's fighting style, and the era he's fighting in, means he'll never get the respect that he fully deserves. That said, he has only himself to blame for turning off American fans. That disaster against Ibragimov at the Garden forever sealed his fate among the casuals.

    Comment

    • JDD1
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Mar 2014
      • 828
      • 28
      • 19
      • 961

      #12
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
      Wlad-Leapai was a disaster for ESPN. They got 500k viewers. When 1.5 million is what they usually get for that time slot.
      true. Most people turned it off by the 3rd round. they missed a ko by a few minutes. How bad must a fight be that you turn it off so quick

      Comment

      • WilkinsOlajuwon
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2013
        • 2506
        • 73
        • 54
        • 8,736

        #13
        A win for the sport.

        too bad fanboys have to forcibly twist it into a barb about Wlad's fight. thats really helpful, fellas.

        Comment

        • JDD1
          Banned
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Mar 2014
          • 828
          • 28
          • 19
          • 961

          #14
          Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon
          A win for the sport.

          too bad fanboys have to forcibly twist it into a barb about Wlad's fight. thats really helpful, fellas.
          My man, if you can't see the significance of the HWT champion doing less on US TV then other HWT's thats on you.

          I mentioned it because it shows how the US audience feels about poor HWT fights vs exciting ones.

          Comment

          • WilkinsOlajuwon
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 2506
            • 73
            • 54
            • 8,736

            #15
            Originally posted by JDD1
            My man, if you can't see the significance of the HWT champion doing less on US TV then other HWT's thats on you.

            I mentioned it because it shows how the US audience feels about poor HWT fights vs exciting ones.
            Whatever you say man.

            Comment

            • DoktorSleepless
              DoktorWakeless
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 11473
              • 440
              • 186
              • 27,349

              #16
              1 point represents 1% of households with televisions. There are 115.6 million television households so 1 point equals 1,156,000 households. And 0.8 points would equal to 924,800 households.

              Don't know how many viewers that is though.

              Comment

              • -PBP-
                32 Time World Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2012
                • 24107
                • 836
                • 635
                • 34,297

                #17
                Originally posted by DoktorSleepless
                1 point represents 1% of households with televisions. There are 115.6 million television households so 1 point equals 1,156,000 households. And 0.8 points would equal to 924,800 households.

                Don't know how many viewers that is though.
                ESPN wanted 1 million households or viewers in order to do this again?

                Comment

                • New England
                  Strong champion.
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 37514
                  • 1,926
                  • 1,486
                  • 97,173

                  #18
                  Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
                  Someone break this down into number of viewers or something.

                  Wth is the 4.1 referring to?


                  Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                  generally it's a percentage of all viewership on television at the time. they're national, so it's obviously got to compete with channels everybody can get.



                  i could be wrong. i didn't even read the article. when you hear "it did a 4.1," that's generally referring to the share of households.

                  Comment

                  • crold1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 6347
                    • 324
                    • 122
                    • 19,304

                    #19
                    Originally posted by LarryXXX
                    That is a damn shame, Klit fight came on a week before and was a failure. why is this?
                    It was announced last minute, few knew if was on, and it was a terrible match.

                    Comment

                    • King_
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2012
                      • 8053
                      • 329
                      • 385
                      • 18,528

                      #20
                      Originally posted by JDD1
                      My man, if you can't see the significance of the HWT champion doing less on US TV then other HWT's thats on you.

                      I mentioned it because it shows how the US audience feels about poor HWT fights vs exciting ones.
                      Who cares? What are you suggesting be done exactly?


                      Wlad ratings suck on ESPN. Oh well. He is still the HW champion of the world lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP