Bermane Stiverne vs. Deontay Wilder

[Tom Cruise]

He's been knocked out and down in amateurs many times.

Maybe but kds aren't that rare in am hw boxing. These are still big men.

Plus he was so raw. Even worse than he is now. When you are that inexperienced you aren't taking anything off the shots.

Again not saying he has a good chin. Just saying its undecided either way imo

[sabonis11]

my betting head says stirverne gunna knock wilder out in rounds 3-6.

my rational head says stirverne on the ropes is gunna tee up a right hand that drops stirverne.

Both my rational and betting head have me picking Stiverne, I played it out in my head, watched a lot of their fights and I just don't see how Wilder Can win this...

I think Stiverne will end it around the fourth and no later then the sixth!

[bigjavi973]

He's had an eraser of a right hand against bums. It's hard to know how hard he really punches. It looks legit but this fight will prove what his power's really like.

His learning to fight on the fly is why I don't think he wins this fight. He doesn't know how to fight. He's going to be screwed when that right hand isn't taking Stiverne out right away and he's eating huge counter shots, because he doesn't know how to defend himself or properly set up his right hand against someone worth a damn.

Like I said in my first post, I wouldn't be angry if I'm wrong.

Everyone keeps complaining about bums this and bums that. What are stiverne's notable wins besides crapreola? Also take a look at "common opponents". other "top" heavyweights have fought some of the SAME bums ya complain about.

[Butt stuff]

Watched Gavern-Wilder today, I wanted Wilder to win before but now I know Stiverne takes it!! All he needs to do is wheel in, tuck his head down and throw a hail mary overhand right (ala Gavern) whilst Wilders feet stay cemented in stone and his chin splinters into a thousand tiny fragments.

If Gavern can repeatedly land dat bomb then Stiverne can too but with the force of super saiyan lvl 3.

[bigjavi973]

First, ranking a boxer not by the guys he fought but by the guys who fought the guys he fought is silly.

Second, the guys Wilder fought all lost every single fight to the guys listed. So what is that supposed to tell us about Wilder? Wlad could beat up 10 average guys off the street, and so could Wilder... that's supposed to mean Wilder is on Wlad's level? Come on.

It's going to be an interesting fight and the first real test for Wilder. Either he is the real deal or he isn't. If he is, he will get a lot of respect, but I don't think he has what it takes. His career has been very carefully managed, and Stiverne isn't a pushover. He punches back and hard.

you are acting as the list of the common opponents I put are inaccurate. Yes you can look at COMMON OPPONENTS in boxing, sorry you didn't know that.

[fightmuseumlv]

It's about time that we get to see a great heavyweight fight again in Las Vegas. It's been too long.

[Caught Square]

Oh he can't wait till saturday, he get a chance to hit somebody in the face

[The Problem Child]

BOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMBBBB SQUUUAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!

I saw him live in PR, this is the video I took after the controversial ending to his fight against Malik.

[Easy Work.]

And these guys are wearing headgears and bigger gloves.

Not really a valid argument, so what if he got TKO in amatuers. He started boxing at like 20 years old and look how far he has gotten already. Hes pretty much learning on the fly and that TKO was just a learning experience

[bigjavi973]

Not really a valid argument, so what if he got TKO in amatuers. He started boxing at like 20 years old and look how far he has gotten already. Hes pretty much learning on the fly and that TKO was just a learning experience

I actually laugh when they use that argument. Same sh^t they said about kovalev in the ams. LMAO