Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who would rank superior in this WW triangle?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I don't think any of them would easily beat the others

    Comment


    • #12
      Porter/Bradley would be a brutal fight.

      I actually think Thurman could stop Bradley via ref stoppage.

      Comment


      • #13
        Everyone that is picking Thurman or Porter over Bradley just started watching boxing this month, hilarious...

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Jack Napier View Post
          1 Bradley
          2 Thurman
          3 Porter
          I agree with this.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Foreign Soil View Post
            Bradley, though he seems to be on the fade.

            Thurman vs Porter is a match that has got to be made. Edge to Thurman but Porter would make it uncomfortable as hell.
            Why is Bradley on the fade? Cos he lost to Pacquiao?

            Bradley is the 3rd best welterweight on the planet, he deserves to be spoken about in the same sentence as Floyd, Pac and possibly JMM.

            Everyone else and that includes Porter, Thurman, Maidana, Alexander, Khan, Collazo and who ever else are leagues below how good those 3 are.

            Thurman might have the best chance of the 3 to reach the top but that's still some years away.

            Comment


            • #16
              Bradley's resume makes Thurman and Porter look like a joke. Bradley has dominated guys like an undefeated Devon Alexander, Kendal Holt, prime Junior Witter, miguel Vazquez, undefeated Lamont Peterson, undefeated Luis Abregu, Ruslan Provodnikov, and stopped Casamayor when Guerrero couldn't. Neither Thurman or Porter has beaten anyone comparable to anybody on that list.

              Bradley is the 3rd best welterweight on the planet behind floyd and PAC and will remain that way till he loses to someone other than PAC.

              Comment


              • #17
                All those fighters.were at 140....bradley has not done much at.147....got a gift vs pac and a loss, beat 1 ww win jmm, barely beat provodnikov who as was not ranked at ww...thurman kos bradley and porter should be betting fav

                If you are no a slick guy and have no punch you will be in deep **** at ww...maidana beats him imo, pac, money, if he was GBP he would have a loss already at ww

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
                  Why is Bradley on the fade? Cos he lost to Pacquiao?

                  Bradley is the 3rd best welterweight on the planet, he deserves to be spoken about in the same sentence as Floyd, Pac and possibly JMM.

                  Everyone else and that includes Porter, Thurman, Maidana, Alexander, Khan, Collazo and who ever else are leagues below how good those 3 are.

                  Thurman might have the best chance of the 3 to reach the top but that's still some years away.
                  Not because he lost but the way that he lost - he "won" the first Pac fight due to stamina, in the rematch he didn't have half the stamina. He beat Marquez, but it was a style matchup that he should've dominated more easily than what he did. Obviously Bradley's still a good fighter, but he's starting to fade.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    1. Bradley
                    2. I'm starting to think Thurman is better than Porter, and will beat him.
                    3. Porter.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Bradley has the best resume, has beat the better fighters and is more experienced. You have to go with him until Porter or Thurman start doing what Bradley has done over the similar period of time

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP