How can anyone hate Keith's "take on all comers attitude"?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39960
    • 5,045
    • 1,449
    • 234,543

    #21
    Keith's "Take on all comers" attitude is the attitude that every other pro boxer has at his stature. Once they get to that level where they are in a position to only pick the biggest money fights, that "Take on all comers" doesn't make much sense. Look at his resume, no win over a Top 10 fighter yet. Of course he'd want to take on all comers.

    I am not hating BTW, I am KT fan for sure. I am just making logic out of this "feared" talk and now this take on all comers comment. Newsflash, even Floyd Mayweather was calling out everybody when he was on the come up at 130-140.

    Comment

    • FerFAL
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2013
      • 2017
      • 121
      • 36
      • 8,241

      #22
      Originally posted by Pigeons
      Diaz was the most legit B-side on the card before last night IMO. Too bad he offered the least resistance. Belmontes should have walked away with the strap but you have to blame him for not throwing punches at the end, he was fighting as if he was champion. Matthysse-Molina was bloody fun.
      Dont get me wrong I like Thurman. I knew Chaves was a tough SOB and that fight was pretty good, it gave Thurman legit credibility. But last night, Diaz was there to just collect a paycheck and go home. Lets be honest, he didnt put up a fight at all.
      Maybe its just me but the guys heart just wasnt in the fight, he sure didnt believe he could win and didnt seem interested in even trying.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP