better win: Oscar over Vargas or Floyd over Cotto
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Cotto's entire claim of being among the best fighters at 154 is based on him beating a piss poor excuse for a belt holder in Yuri Foreman.....four years ago. He's done **** all of note besides beat some decrepit fossils and lose comprehensively to anyone with a working pulse since then.
Lara, Alvarez, Kirkland, Trout, Andrade, Angulo, Molina, Charlo - all smash or have their way with the shopworn, bloated gatekeeper.Comment
-
No he's not lol....he already lost to trout, would lose to Canelo,Lara, and Kirkland all handily. Probably lose or have a tough fight with Molina,Andrade,and others. He's a natural welter who prime was 2007-2008ish.Comment
-
And Vargas was a good fighter but they ruined the kid throwing him in with world champions like 15 fights into his career. He could have been really good.Comment
-
-
Ok now explain to me who the hell did Vargas beat after losing to Trinidad? I swear u dudes are new to boxing. After the Trinidad fight, Vargas was completely done as a world class fighter. I mean his next time out he got sat on his ass by a random tune up. He never achived Jack **** on the world level after that fight. I seriously just shake my head at the ******ity of the posters on this site. Especially when they think they know crap they obviously don't.Comment
-
Comment
Comment