-
-
Why? Because that's what the whole back and forth is about
You saying he was the Lineal Champion. You said he was the Lineal Champion mate. You said it, not anybody else.
That what the whole discussion has been about. You saying he was the Lineal Champion and that's the point you were defending until you admitted you were wrong.
The real issue and topic?
What is the real issue and topic? Like I said, this whole thing came from you saying he was the Lineal Champion. That was the "Initial topic".
You didn't say anything about ring belts, being the best. You said he was the Lineal Champion and were called out on it. After defending that claim for a few pages you've come out and said he wasn't the Lineal Champion which of course as most know, he wasn't.
That's really all there is to it. You've admitted you were wrong about him being the Lineal Champion. No more to be said on it.Comment
-
Grasping at straws. One of the finest examples I have seen. Well done.Why? Because that's what the whole back and forth is about You saying he was the Lineal Champion. You said he was the Lineal Champion mate. You said it, not anybody else.
That what the whole discussion has been about. You saying he was the Lineal Champion and that's the point you were defending until you admitted you were wrong.
The real issue and topic? What is the real issue and topic? Like I said, this whole thing came from you saying he was the Lineal Champion. That was the "Initial topic".
You didn't say anything about ring belts, being the best. You said he was the Lineal Champion and were called out on it. After defending that claim for a few pages you've come out and said he wasn't the Lineal Champion which of course as most know, he wasn't.
That's really all there is to it. You've admitted you were wrong about him being the Lineal Champion. No more to be said on it.Comment
-
What the hell are you talking about? You are the one who said he was the Lineal Champion. And that's what the whole back and forth was about.
You've stood corrected now so I don't know why you're still going on about it.
We've established he wasn't the Lineal Champion. That's it, there's no more to be said on it.Comment
-
Ok so why keep commenting on it? Does it bother you? I mean Joes accomplishments that is. It appears to bother you a bit. Would you like to talk about that?What the hell are you talking about? You are the one who said he was the Lineal Champion. And that's what the whole back and forth was about.
You've stood corrected now so I don't know why you're still going on about it.
We've established he wasn't the Lineal Champion. That's it, there's no more to be said on it.Comment
-
You're the one who keeps commenting on it, not me. You just bumped the thread did you not?
It doesn't bother me one bit. Like I just said and have said about 3 or 4 times, we've established you were wrong about him being the Lineal Champion. No more to be said on the matter.Comment
-
Ok. So thats been established. He was not 'technically lineal' but was the ring belt holder and ranked number one in the only ranking that matters. You felt it necessary to hammer home that he was not lineal as hard as you could even though in this case it means nothing and you admitted to that. So enlighten anyone reading this as to why you turned into the accuracy police and got off the real point I was making. Also lol @ the fact that I had not commented on here since yesterday sometime and you commented within a few mins of me returning with a response. Trolling much? LolComment
-
I know it's been established Yet you keep commenting, then ask my why I keep commenting?
I felt necessary to keep discussing it obviously because you kept defending your point of him being the Lineal Champion. That what the whole back and forth was about. You said he was the Lineal Champion, someone called you out on it, and the discussion went from there.
Accuracy police? You keep going back to the same thing. You said he was the Lineal Champion, that's a specific thing. You didn't say he was the best, or he was The Ring, you said he was the Lineal Champion which was the whole point of dicussion. How is that me being the accuracy police? YOU said it! You made a claim, that was incorrect and now you've stood corrected. I don't know how many times it has to be said, it's as simple as that, it's done, finished, discussion over.
The "real point"? "He was the Lineal Champion" again is a specific claim and an incorrect one. People called you out on it and you defended that claim until proven wrong and now you've changed your mind on what your "real point" was Neither here nor there anyway.
Not sure what you mean by the last sentence. We were having this discussion yesterday. You've now bumped the thread today while I'm online so obviously I've seen it on the first page.
You bumped the thread, the proceeded to say "Why are you still going on about it?" When it was you who's gone back to it and bumped it. Far as I'm concerned the discussions been over since yesterday, since you admitted you were wrong about him being the Lineal Champion.
Comment
-
Only on NSBComment
-
Did that guy actually label himself the most knowledgeable poster on this forum?
Comment
Tweet
Comment