Originally posted by Fantastic One
View Post
I have Crohn's disease and would likely be in bed on disability without cannabis. I've fought amateur matches at the local level several times even though THC is a banned substance. I did something wrong technically. Would you put me on the same level as someone with loaded gloves?
Yes, certain wins should have an asterisk next to them, but again you have to add circumstance. Toney did come up positive for testosterone that he used knowingly because he has a damaged pituitary gland from so much head trauma.
In other sports there is a limit to how much testosterone you can have which allows wiggle room for "natural" products that exacerbate your own bodies production of the hormone. Other than football it is not common for athletes to have the same problem as James.
Should the rule be that damaged athletes are allowed to supplement until their hormone levels are on par with other athletes or that any steroid use is unjustified no matter the reason. There are too many variables to come up with a rule that works for everyone and the decision was made. Toney was punished and lost his title. It's official.
Should his other wins be questioned? Certainly not. Not on the level of Margarito's controversy.
What you're trying to do is create absolute wrongs and rights in a black and white way. I know it seems like the objective thing to do but in order to be objective you need to consider all of the facts and acknowledge that not all situations are created equal. Otherwise you end up with a much uglier picture than when you started.
Comment