Is Bradley the new Berto?

[tank17211]

bradley did arguably lose 4 fights in a row.

that's more loses than berto if you think about it... how bout that?

Arguably? Ask anyones fan base about their fighter and im sure a lot of there loses are debatable. Pretty ridiculous analogy.

[Craveman]

You guys don't know **** about boxing. Bradley always > Berto.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

i really want to report this thread for its sheer ******edness

[FlatLine]

a prime bradley lost to past-prime pac twice, arguably lost to past-prime marquez and virtual no-name (at the time) provodnikov..

he's not the 147 fighter some you seem to think he is. at 140 he was definitely the second best in the division around the time he ducked khan (the #1) but at 147 he might not even make the top 5 even though he's in his prime. you could easily place pacquiao, marquez, prov, of course floyd and khan above him (since by ducking khan he conceded defeat)

[sugarsmosley]

bradley is still an elite fighter, he'll be a champ again soon.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

a prime bradley lost to past-prime pac twice, arguably lost to past-prime marquez and virtual no-name (at the time) provodnikov..

he's not the 147 fighter some you seem to think he is. at 140 he was definitely the second best in the division around the time he ducked khan (the #1) but at 147 he might not even make the top 5 even though he's in his prime. you could easily place pacquiao, marquez, prov, of course floyd and khan above him (since by ducking khan he conceded defeat)

**** you Khan fans...seriously...**** you and your mothers

[Jimmy 23]

why the f**k is this thread still alive?

[FlatLine]

lets say bradley officially had those 4 losses on his record, instead of just one - and that's something that could have easily happened if he wasn't lucky with the judges..

what yall saying then.. youd be calling him a gatekeeper too.. just because he got lucky with the judges it doesnt make him any less gatekeeper.

[Hougigo]

lets say bradley officially had those 4 losses on his record, instead of just one - and that's something that could have easily happened if he wasn't lucky with the judges..

what yall saying then.. youd be calling him a gatekeeper too.. just because he got lucky with the judges it doesnt make him any less gatekeeper.

Is Khan a gatekeeper after losing twice?

[tank17211]

a prime bradley lost to past-prime pac twice, arguably lost to past-prime marquez and virtual no-name (at the time) provodnikov..

he's not the 147 fighter some you seem to think he is. at 140 he was definitely the second best in the division around the time he ducked khan (the #1) but at 147 he might not even make the top 5 even though he's in his prime. you could easily place pacquiao, marquez, prov, of course floyd and khan above him (since by ducking khan he conceded defeat)

Only one is a legitimate loss. Everything is arguable now a days.