Is Bradley the new Berto?

[FlatLine]

some of you guys aren't capable of seeing the bigger picture.. i suppose only a few people have the same sort of ability as myself but that's nothing new..

let me simplify things for yall - bradley is overrated and yall are creating a false hype around him.. he could easily have 4 losses on his record against fighters who arent even natural welterweights.. he'd have a fifth loss if he had the balls to face khan at 140..

[Rome-By-Ko]

some of you guys aren't capable of seeing the bigger picture.. i suppose only a few people have the same sort of ability as myself but that's nothing new..

let me simplify things for yall - bradley is overrated and yall are creating a false hype around him.. he could easily have 4 losses on his record against fighters who arent even natural welterweights.. he'd have a fifth loss if he had the balls to face khan at 140..

You do know Bradley is not a natural WW either right??

He could have,but he does not..He actually only has one loss..

Berto wishes he's had near the career as Bradley has..

Bradley has never been over hyped and has had to work for everything he's got..

[FlatLine]

nah bradley is gatekeeper.. no one has dropped a solid argument to suggest otherwise..

his only legit & indisputable win against a "perceived" top fighter was against alexander.. but porter showed alexander is overrated.. porter is same guy who drew (and some think lost) to diaz - the guy khan beat easy..

anyway every other bradley "win" against top fighters could have easily been a loss with different judges.. he just lucky cos he was on home turf

[FlatLine]

prov to bradley was sort of like ortiz to berto.. only difference was bradley got a gift decision berto didnt

[IMDAZED]

A gatekeeper? I can't think of too many welters who can beat Bradley. He's top 5 at worst.