Originally posted by IronDanHamza
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pac full mitt workout! Looking mofofast!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostWhen's Pacquaio ever had a hard time landing?
Pacquaio's rarely even needed to adjust because his A plan is too much for most fighters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Twako View Postthen i guess morales barrera marquez cotto delahoya hatton etc were all dumb. they have this onedimensional not smart fighter in front of them and they couldn't win. jmm finally though after the 4th try.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Twako View Postthen i guess morales barrera marquez cotto delahoya hatton etc were all dumb. they have this onedimensional not smart fighter in front of them and they couldn't win. jmm finally though after the 4th try.
Are you reading?
Where have I said Pacquaio is one dimensional? That's a new one.
Since when does losing to a guy who isn't overly smart, make you dumb? What's with all these ridiculous analogies?
Mares isn't really a smart fighter, yet he beat Moreno, who is a smart fighter, that doesn't make Moreno dumb it just means Mares was the better guy on the fight and he had the tools to beat him.
Pacquaio first and foremost is a better fighter than every fighter you just mentioned that he's beaten, so that's one reason why he beat them.
Secondly, Pacquaio has many tools in his arsenal that troubled those fighters, that's another reason why he beat all of them.
Not every great fighter is a smart fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evol View Postthis is what im saying. they're saying pac is not smart because he cant adjust so when marquez lost to floyd because he couldnt adjust does that mean maraquez is not smart also? LOL
The vast majority of the time, physical ability and style win a professional boxing match, regardless of how smart a guy is in the ring.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostYou're making it sound like smarts are what determines a fight above all else when it isn't.
The vast majority of the time, physical ability and style win a professional boxing match, regardless of how smart a guy is in the ring.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evol View Postim not at all, im only debating the fact that pac is not a smart fighter when i believe he is.
You're saying "he's not a master scientist" which is basically saying he doesn't have "very high ring IQ" which is basically what I am saying when I say "He's not really a smart fighter".
If you're saying "Not dumb" = "Smart" then yeah Pacquaio is a "smart" fighter in that sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evol View Postim not at all, im only debating the fact that pac is not a smart fighter when i believe he is.
Because he was physically and stylistically too good for these fighters. Simple as that. Most the time, that's what why any fighter wins any fight. Like IronDan has said a dozen times now, it's not calling Pac dumb to say he isn't an especially smart fighter. He has some ring intelligence, but he doesn't operate in a ring based on that intelligence. He operates on instinct and physical ability.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostThis **** again.
Are you reading?
Where have I said Pacquaio is one dimensional? That's a new one.
Since when does losing to a guy who isn't overly smart, make you dumb? What's with all these ridiculous analogies?
Mares isn't really a smart fighter, yet he beat Moreno, who is a smart fighter, that doesn't make Moreno dumb it just means Mares was the better guy on the fight and he had the tools to beat him.
Pacquaio first and foremost is a better fighter than every fighter you just mentioned that he's beaten, so that's one reason why he beat them.
Secondly, Pacquaio has many tools in his arsenal that troubled those fighters, that's another reason why he beat all of them.
Not every great fighter is a smart fighter.
paulie has the gift of gab, but he isnt as smart as you think in the ring. heck hatton, a come forward fighter messed him up and he couldn't adjust.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostBut you're defending that point by saying, "if he isn't a smart fighter then how did he beat so and so and how did he become so great?"
Because he was physically and stylistically too good for these fighters. Simple as that. Most the time, that's what why any fighter wins any fight. Like IronDan has said a dozen times now, it's not calling Pac dumb to say he isn't an especially smart fighter. He has some ring intelligence, but he doesn't operate in a ring based on that intelligence. He operates on instinct and physical ability.
Some clarity, finally.
Comment
Comment