Carlos Molina... anyone disappointed with this fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UTEP
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2006
    • 12078
    • 620
    • 599
    • 27,204

    #31
    Originally posted by Xi_
    then how do you explain pac rios?

    Pac/Rios was just as bad as Canelo/Angulo. 2 fighters coming off of losses shouldn't be fighting on PPV. What does this have to do with Broner/Molina though?
    Last edited by UTEP; 03-29-2014, 12:24 PM.

    Comment

    • ImStillHere
      Banned
      • May 2013
      • 832
      • 53
      • 5
      • 992

      #32
      Originally posted by Hougigo
      That whole card is weak as shit

      Julio diaz is 0-2-1, John Molina is moving up from LW and his style is going to kill him, Belmontes's only redeeming factor is his minor upset, and he's moving up.

      This card won't last more than 30 minutes total fight time

      Broner, Mr. former P4P and 3 weight division world champion, fighting Molina.....his confidence must've been destroyed beyond repair
      Fair enough. Yes his confidence has been destroyed, thats the point.

      Stop looking for some ideal that does not and never did exist.

      SRL fought plenty of nobodies, SRR had the bum of the month club. Pac and Floyd, Oscar, Mosley , Tito all have weak fights on their record.

      Stop claiming this is anything to do with fights and not your hatred of the fighters on the card. Your pathetic

      Comment

      • ImStillHere
        Banned
        • May 2013
        • 832
        • 53
        • 5
        • 992

        #33
        Originally posted by UTEP
        Pac/Rios was just as bad as Canelo/Angulo. 2 fighters coming off of losses shouldn't be headlining on PPV. What does this have to do with Broner/Molina though?
        The point is your weren't ****ting on Pac for that fight.

        Comment

        • UTEP
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2006
          • 12078
          • 620
          • 599
          • 27,204

          #34
          Originally posted by ImStillHere
          The point is your weren't ****ting on Pac for that fight.

          Uhh yes i was, just like i was ****ting on the Canelo/Angulo PPV. I think you're mistaking me for a Pac fan.

          Comment

          • ImStillHere
            Banned
            • May 2013
            • 832
            • 53
            • 5
            • 992

            #35
            Originally posted by UTEP
            Uhh yes i was, just like i was ****ting on the Canelo/Angulo PPV. I think you're mistaking me for a Pac fan.
            my apologies then.

            Comment

            • UTEP
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2006
              • 12078
              • 620
              • 599
              • 27,204

              #36
              Originally posted by ImStillHere
              my apologies then.

              No prob, i just think the fans should get more for a $70 PPV. This whole undercard is weak. Thurman/Diaz is just as bad.
              Last edited by UTEP; 03-29-2014, 12:37 PM.

              Comment

              • al-Xander
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2010
                • 7412
                • 369
                • 122
                • 13,790

                #37
                Blame the clown duo Schaefer/Haymon. Broner wanted a Maidana rematch. I'm sure he would have taken Khan's challenge. But the clown duo said no.

                Comment

                • ImStillHere
                  Banned
                  • May 2013
                  • 832
                  • 53
                  • 5
                  • 992

                  #38
                  Originally posted by UTEP
                  No prob, i just think the fans should get more for a $70 PPV. This whole undercard is weak. Thurman/Diaz is just as bad.
                  So do I but I'm realistic. Broner and Thurman are big names. And they appeal to Mayweather fans/audience being young black americans. But is insulting the fighters the way to handle it? They really don't pick and choose who they fight (bar Floyd, Pac and Cotto) they are offered a few choices and pick the best one for their career. Just as you or I would if we were in that position.

                  Comment

                  • arraamis
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 8319
                    • 583
                    • 439
                    • 23,488

                    #39
                    Originally posted by JoeMan
                    Blame the clown duo Schaefer/Haymon. Broner wanted a Maidana rematch. I'm sure he would have taken Khan's challenge. But the clown duo said no.
                    GBP are putting their future\potential money-makers in winnable fights as a standard operating procedure -- While this may be a good strategy from a business perspective, it is not good for the sport. For, unless a fighter can stand against all comer's, then they are not stars, nor are they worthy of top-tier PPV dollar earnings.

                    Comment

                    • Fetta
                      nob cheese
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16696
                      • 417
                      • 3
                      • 24,315

                      #40
                      Broner coming off loss and it's the 3rd fight on this card. I have no problem with it. Good name value

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP